Is there any incentive policy for those who download the uploaded files?
Thread Content
I’ve seen that some of the files uploaded by netizens are indeed valuable (not necessarily in terms of their content being excellent, but rather because everyone likes them and can download them for reference), while our moderators may only give ratings at the beginning, or not at all; moreover, most people don’t even leave a message after downloading the files. My suggestion is that the system should carry out some sorting out when a file is downloaded 10,000 times or so – this will not only encourage more people to pay attention to it, but can also serve as a basis for future evaluations, for selecting outstanding examples, and as a criterion for rewards. Rewards mean nothing. It’s an affirmation!
I think the suggestion made by the moderator is good; a reward can be given to the sender after “N” downloads. Not only is posting encouraged, but posting high-quality posts that are downloaded by many people is also encouraged.
Some forums do exactly that, adding the wealth deducted from downloads to the uploader. It is recommended that the forum consider this.
This is a good suggestion; it’s worth considering! It’s not necessary to include everything; including half of it is also feasible! :lol
At the same time, the themed content generates revenue for the forum, which can also consider returning a certain percentage of this revenue to the person who posted the theme. For example, 5%.
It’s best to award points based on the amount downloaded.
This can also reduce the workload of the moderators. Moreover, having rules in place makes things clearer, and to some extent it encourages better quality and quantity of posts.
I think this is a great idea; it serves as encouragement and also allows the best content to be seen by more people.
It seems that the person who posted this is thoughtful. Objection: Regarding forums and the downloading of materials, if the materials were uploaded early and many people download them numerous times, it’s not easy to give a good rating! For widely available materials, with a large number of downloads, it’s difficult to establish standards! For individuals who upload some rare and obscure materials, those materials are extremely valuable when used, yet they do not receive any recognition for doing so. Sometimes, the effort required to upload such materials is not proportionate, which is quite unfair! Regarding the number of downloads and responses to questions, the backend system has been set up to deduct points accordingly. For those who make many downloads but do not receive any rewards, it is necessary to discuss how such rewards should be determined in relation to the value of the information provided :Just the character L – difficult! Regarding what was said above, those who uploaded materials but did not receive any awards cannot be blamed for it as a mistake on the part of the moderators or due to low ratings, as the forum has established a system allowing members to rate each other. Regarding the issue that many downloads are required but only little bonus is given, it might be because the information provided by the downloaders roughly matches the requirements, or because such information is easily available. If one has strong credentials, they should certainly use their personal bonus rights to show their approval of the materials.
It’s reasonable for the system to automatically award points to the post owner based on a certain percentage of downloads! This will encourage everyone to share more meaningful posts and materials! It can also save the moderators a lot of work! Under normal circumstances, as long as I download the attachment, I will definitely give points to the person who shared the material: first of all, to show respect for their effort ； Second, make a note for yourself so that you know you have already downloaded this material and won’t need to download it again! There’s a lot of information on the forum now, and there are also many names that are similar to each other. By rating others, it’s as if you’re leaving a mark for yourself, which makes things easier for you! I also noticed on the forum that many people posted complaints saying, “The materials were downloaded repeatedly”! In fact, it’s only one’s own fault! Why isn’t it possible to rate the original poster during downloading? Besides, scoring doesn’t cost any of one’s wealth! This post was last edited by upcf on 2008-2-26 14:59.]
This proposal is great! Multiplying by a coefficient is more reasonable! This is a great encouragement for those who provide information! Those who actively participate in discussions and answer questions will also not end up in an unbalanced situation!
This proposal is great! Multiplying by a coefficient is more reasonable! This is a great encouragement for those who provide information! Those who actively participate in discussions and answer questions will also not end up in an unbalanced situation!
Today I read an article that had been downloaded 130,000 times, with less than 10 people giving it a rating; I gave it the highest possible rating. In fact, his articles are extremely useful for our work; sometimes we don’t come to the forum because of a specific need – by looking at others’ documents, it inspires our own ideas. Therefore, considering the number of downloads in sequence is a very good source of experience for those of us in the chemical industry. It is recommended to conduct a forum survey and resolve it through voting by “Haoyou”. This post was last edited by cyg780808 on 2008-3-2 16:20.]
For the materials that are widely used by everyone, rating the high-quality ones while downloading them is also a way of acknowledging such good materials!