Forum scoring criteria guidelines
Thread Content
Forum scoring criteria guidelines: 1. When assigning scores within the forum, for technical members such as team members (J), engineers (G), and instructors (K), the level of the person who assigned the score should be indicated using the corresponding letter in the reason for scoring field, in order to distinguish them from regular members and moderators (B)； 2. Regarding the scoring levels, members in grade 3 and below can be rated for reposts, with a score of 3 (Wealth); the technical group starts with a Wealth score of 3 as well, while members at the engineer level and above start with a Wealth score of 4 ； 3. For discussion posts that have been published, the scoring deadline can be extended; those that receive 100+ views and 20+ replies within two weeks will receive additional rewards of 10–50 in Wealth and 5–10 in Charm, depending on their popularity. If the required metrics are met within the deadline but no reward is given, one can contact the corresponding moderator via PM to request it ； 4. Regarding duplicate posts, penalties can be determined based on the specific content of the posts: 1) If they are posted in the same forum and with a time interval of within 8 minutes (due to network issues), no points will be deducted ； 2) For posts with the same content posted in different areas, if the poster’s level is at or below Grade 2, Level 1 (as determined by the posting time), one post can be exempted from penalties, with no points deducted ； 3) Regarding the handling of malicious duplicate posts, different approaches should be taken depending on the severity and content; for material-related posts, they should be deleted ； For requests for help, deleting such posts should not result in a deduction of wealth or charm points; exceptions apply to posts from grade 2 and below (based on the posting date). These posts can be deleted together or ； This requirement will take effect from the date the administrator confirms the response! This post was last edited by Xinchan on 2008-2-24 19:41]
LZ’s thoughts represent a reflection and summary on the recent extensive discussions regarding the excessive use of ratings on forums. It seems that standardizing and regulating the rating system according to this approach has its advantages; after all, standardization and regulation are considered trends in development, and it’s also useful to apply them in management
The first task is currently very difficult and requires a high level of effort. Article 2: Settings can be made in the background. Article 3: Only random bonuses can be awarded, as the amount of posts is too large. Article 4: It is possible to set values (add scoring rules)
In my opinion, there is no fixed boundary or standard for scoring; it depends entirely on personal feelings, influenced by factors such as one’s mood at the time and whether the content relates to one’s interests. One can only try to ensure that their scores remain consistent from a subjective standpoint, as it’s extremely difficult to establish a unified scoring standard. ——Learn together*, improve together; giving roses leaves a pleasant fragrance in one’s own hands
At present, the forum has established a scoring supervision mechanism that effectively prevents arbitrary scoring, but it is merely a platform for supervision and public display; no corresponding scoring standards have been set for members’ scores. Members’ evaluations are based solely on their own understanding of the issues being assessed. Moreover, due to restrictions on their scoring rights as well as the influence of incentive factors, it is inevitable that the scores assigned may be inappropriate. After all, nothing can be accomplished without rules. It is recommended to establish scoring criteria as soon as possible.
We need to take this matter seriously, haha. But I think our forum is doing very well, really.
Heart Edition: What does “The technical team has completed the initial evaluation” mean? ? Is it “one”? ? But I found it to be three; rankings for wealth levels one and two are no longer possible. Last edited by bingyu252 on 2008-3-3 11:28]
It's good to have detailed scoring criteria. This meets the common wish of us all! Hope for more detailed standards: evaluation criteria for ordinary people!
There should also be standards for scoring in order to ensure fairness.
Has it been adjusted again recently? The highest score was 5 just a couple of days ago; why is it only 3 these past few days? A notification should be given for forum adjustments... Where should this be displayed?
http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-43521-1-1.html The forum revised its scoring criteria on March 22nd!
Go to the forum’s affairs area, I’ll help you transfer there!