The forum prohibits the posting of articles without a source, as well as the reproduction of articles whose original text is not allowed to be shared! The publisher will lose 3 points in appeal!
Thread Content
Starting today, the article section of the forum will be closed. When it becomes available will be announced; forum moderators can request to switch roles to cleaners. Guiding everyone to shift towards the exchange of technical information and other content in order to further improve the academic level of the forum is Haichuan’s development goal for this year. The forum prohibits the posting of articles without a source, as well as the reproduction of content whose original version is prohibited! If someone reports such posted content to the administrators or moderators, 3 points of charm will be deducted. All team members in management are requested to delete such articles directly or inform the moderators! (The content that was already posted in the original article section will not be processed at this time, as posting there has been stopped; if such content is controversial, it will be deleted once it is discovered.) Together we learn*, together we improve – cleaners
It must be implemented strictly; publishing papers or journals can easily lead to copyright disputes, and in severe cases, legal consequences may arise. For the proper development of the forum, we hope everyone can understand. The moderators of each section are responsible for strictly overseeing the content within their respective sections. :handshake Last edited by Bincheng Watcher on 2008-3-4 21:09]
I firmly support this, and at the same time hope that the administrators will play a role in supervising the posting of content. It is recommended that any inappropriate posts be deleted promptly and warnings issued to prevent legal issues!
I don’t think it’s necessary to do this in order to eliminate plagiarism; however, citing the sources of literature can help avoid disputes and also provide valuable knowledge for the readers on the forum. This is a paradise for learning, and without such practices, there are fewer opportunities to broaden one’s horizons... It’s not necessary to address the root causes; what matters is how to manage things properly. Citing the source of an article, the author, the date of publication, and the key points are all good ways to handle this. Those who violate the rules or plagiarize others should be dealt with seriously, and in severe cases, their accounts can be banned
In fact, journals and papers are available online, and many of them are paid. As for copyright, I don’t think it’s necessary to attach too much importance to it. To be honest, there are also my own journals and papers in HaiChuan, and I’m glad to see that the work I’ve written can be shared with others. This seems to have nothing to do with the boss’s statement; I’m just annoyed to see authors filing complaints. Since these will have a negative impact on the forum, it’s best to respect the boss’s decision
Can moderators move such posts to the trash can if they are found in various forums? Just delete it directly.
Copyright issues regarding papers and journals have existed for a long time, especially those in Chinese. There are relatively few complaints from authors; it must be that there are many publishers! Many forums have also explicitly prohibited such posts! For things there’s nothing to do about, just carry them out earnestly! You can contact me via text message or QQ if needed!
Generally speaking, in accordance with the publication guidelines, as long as the source of the paper is clearly indicated, there should be no major problems; unless it is internal or confidential material, which might raise issues related to copyright infringement. It can be said that there are no issues with submitting papers that are intended for public publication.
Learn together*, improve together! I’m participating, I support it!!!
Strictly speaking, it is not allowed to be published. However, when presenting or solving a problem and a certain literature or paper is used, although the full text cannot be published, a brief introduction to the cited source can be provided, such as an abstract or keywords, etc. This is also in compliance with laws and regulations. In fact, it is also a great honor for the authors of the papers; after all, SCI is all about counting how many times a paper has been cited, right?
Although it means losing many opportunities to study articles, for the healthy and orderly development of the forum at present, I still support the decision to maintain it. It is suggested to consider forming an alliance with these journals to operate together, which would not only help promote journal publications but also attract more people to visit the forum. As for the distribution of benefits, please have the forum’s management consider it.
I also think it’s sufficient to indicate the source of the article and related copyright information; completely preventing its publication could have an impact on the dissemination of information and the development of the forum. Of course, now that relevant regulations have been established, we have no choice but to comply with them.
For the long-term operation of the forum and to gain more academic benefits, we firmly support it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This will have an impact on the development of the forum.
Perhaps we could adopt the approach used in other forums: when referring to a certain article for information on a specific topic, we could indicate which article to consult and who its author is. This would also show respect for the author. What do you all think?
I do not support this decision! This will reduce the appeal of this forum!
I agree with the 20th floor. :handshake :handshake