Thread Content
The filter materials for protective masks are mainly divided into two categories: dust-proof and gas-proof. Their function is to adsorb harmful aerosols, including dust, smoke, fog droplets, poisons, and toxic vapors, through the filter material, thereby preventing them from being inhaled by people. A good filter material for a protective mask should meet the following three conditions: first, it must have high filtration efficiency when the mask fits tightly to the user’s face; second, it should result in low breathing resistance; third, it must be comfortable for the user to wear. There are various materials used for the filters of dust-proof masks, including ordinary fabrics, animal fur, and non-woven fabrics. Currently, a synthetic, electrostatically treated non-woven fabric material is very popular in national standards. Why use electrostatic treatment? Many of us have used gauze masks. Leaving aside the issue of how well the structure of such masks fits against the human face (to be honest, their fit is quite poor; many tiny particles that can be extremely harmful to our health can get into the respiratory tract and lungs through the gaps between the mask and the face), their filtering materials are usually some type of mechanical fabric. The only way to achieve high dust filtration efficiency with such materials is by increasing their thickness, but the downside of this is that it causes users to experience significant breathing difficulties and discomfort. The treated non-woven fabric can not only block large dust particles, but the static charge on its surface can also use electrostatic attraction to capture fine dust particles – those that pose the greatest threat to our health – preventing them from being inhaled by us, thus achieving a very high dust-blocking efficiency. The thickness of the filter media is very low, **which reduces the breathing resistance for the user and provides comfort, thus meeting the three essential conditions for a good filter media as mentioned earlier. With high-quality filter materials, combined with a scientifically designed mask structure, an efficient and high-performance mask is created—one that offers convenience and comfort in use while truly protecting your health. By incorporating a high-efficiency activated carbon layer for deodorization into the electrostatic non-woven filter layer, a dust mask can also protect against certain toxins with lower concentrations, thus meeting your specific work requirements. Currently, there are various international standards for the testing and certification of mask filter materials. As technology advances, different countries and regions continuously update their own standards in order to encourage manufacturers to produce better products that can meet the needs of users and protect the health of workers. A representative example is the new standard for the testing and certification of dust masks, 42CFR84, issued on June 8, 1995 by the U.S. **National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). It reflects well the level of advancement in high technology as well as the results of research on personal protective equipment. In this standard ； The filter materials for dust-proof masks are divided into three categories: N, R, and P. Category N filters can be used to protect against oily aerosols (dust, smoke, mist droplets), while categories R and P can be used to protect against all aerosols, whether oily or not; however, there are limitations when using R category filters to protect against oily aerosols. Why is such classification necessary? Because research has shown that when the carriers of some particulate matter are oily, these oily substances, when attached to electrostatic non-woven fabrics, reduce their electrical properties, allowing fine dust to pass through. Therefore, filter materials designed to prevent oil-containing aerosols need to undergo special electrostatic treatment in order to effectively block fine dust. Within each type of filter media, 3 efficiency levels are further distinguished: 95%, 99%, and 99.97% (or simply referred to as 95, 99, 100), resulting in a total of 9 subcategories of filter media. In terms of the testing and certification of filter media, a \"worst-case scenario\" approach is adopted; that is, the conditions used for testing in the laboratory are set to the most severe ones. For example, in efficiency tests, the sodium amide salts or DOP oil mist used have a kinetic diameter of 0.3 μm, which represents the size of particles that are extremely small and most capable of penetrating the filter media. In China, medical talcum powder is used, with over 90% of its suspended particles having a diameter of less than 5 μm, and over 70% having a diameter of less than 2 μm. During the experiment, the gas flow rate through the filter media was 42.5 L/min, which corresponds to the breathing volume during heavy physical labor. In addition, the filter media were subjected to high-temperature and high-humidity pretreatment before the experiment, simulating a harsh working environment. All of this was done to determine whether, under such demanding conditions, the filter media could meet the required efficiency standards; if so, they would undoubtedly be able to protect workers’ health more effectively in real-world applications. Gas-proof filtration media generally use activated carbon or chemically treated activated carbon as materials, which filter toxic gases or vapors through adsorption or chemical reactions to prevent them from being inhaled by humans. The internal structure of activated carbon contains numerous micropores that create a very large specific surface area; these micropores can trap toxic vapors and gas molecules of different sizes, preventing them from escaping. Of course, the handling and installation of activated carbon require high standards; if it is not handled properly or if the activated carbon particles are too coarse, resulting in gaps between them, toxic gases can penetrate through these gaps into the respiratory tract without being absorbed. Therefore, the practice of letting workers replace the bagged activated carbon by themselves is highly unscientific. In a good chemical gas filter cartridge, the activated carbon should be packed tightly; it should have a small particle size and a large specific surface area, so as to ensure a longer period of protection against gases. At the same time, it is important that the breathing resistance be low to ensure comfortable wear. Generally, different types of chemical filtration cartridges can protect against various types of chemicals, such as organic substances, acids, comprehensive toxins, ammonia, and so on. So far, we have learned about the structure and working principles of dust-proof, insect-proof, and poison-proof filter media. Now, we are also very interested in knowing when it is necessary to replace these filter media Or in other words, how long can a filter media last? Answering this question is not easy; it’s not 40 minutes, 2 hours, or 3 days, 10 days. The figures that manufacturers can provide are those obtained under specific laboratory conditions. In actual use, answering this question is quite complex, as there are many uncertain factors that determine the lifespan of a mask. For example, factors such as the duration for which the user wears a mask, the severity of the work performed, the frequency of breathing, the nature of the harmful substances encountered, their concentration, and the humidity level of the working environment all affect the service life of the filter material. For example, when chemical gas filters are used in humid environments, a large number of water vapor molecules in the air get absorbed by the activated carbon, thereby occupying the micropores that should be used to absorb toxic gas molecules. Studies show that when such filters are used in environments with a relative humidity of over 80% and a temperature above 20°C, their lifespan can sometimes be reduced by up to 50%. From this, we can see that determining the usage time out of thin air or based on imagination is incorrect. So, how do we determine whether it’s time to replace the filter material? Here’s a method: For dust-filtering cotton, when the mask fits tightly against the user’s face and the user experiences significant breathing resistance, it indicates that the filter cotton is covered with dust particles and should be replaced. The gas filter cartridge should be replaced as soon as the user detects the smell of toxic substances, even when the mask fits tightly to the user’s face. But at the same time, this raises another problem: some chemicals are colorless and odorless, or have an imperceptible smell, yet they are toxic, such as carbon monoxide. Such chemicals should not be protected against toxins using air-filtering systems or chemical filter cartridges, as it is impossible to determine the effectiveness of these filters. At this point, it is advisable to consider using a supplied-air mask, as it completely isolates the working environment from the air source.