Thread Content
Crazy sulfur: Our country is the world’s largest importer of sulfur, with imports accounting for 32% of global sulfur trade volume. Sulfur is mainly used to produce acid in our country. In recent years, the demand for phosphate fertilizers, compound fertilizers, and other industrial acids has increased. This year, the price of sulfur has suddenly doubled, market prices have kept rising, and the price of sulfuric acid has also increased steadily.
It’s not just sulfur! There are also copper concentrate, iron ore, and so on. The fundamental reason for the rising prices of industrial raw materials is that China’s economic growth model has not undergone any fundamental changes! Still pursuing an extensive and exploitative model of economic growth! It hasn’t changed in decades! When \"Made in China\" is replaced by \"Created in China,\" all of the aforementioned problems will no longer exist.
Yes, it’s a manufacturing powerhouse. With such a large population, it’s essential to have strong manufacturing capabilities; only through strong manufacturing can there be great innovation, and only with a solid foundation can development occur. Third-rate companies manufacture products; second-rate companies develop technologies; first-rate companies set standards. China needs more companies of the first and second ranks.
I agree with the view from the third floor: third-rate companies produce products; second-rate companies develop technologies; first-rate companies set standards.
The price of sulfur has now exceeded 5,000 yuan, and it is said to keep rising – it’s absolutely crazy. A new term has emerged in the industry, “sulfur hustlers,” referring specifically to those who are busy dealing with sulfur.
What’s the price of sulfuric acid? By how much is its increase rate higher than that of sulfur?
Sulfur has dropped a little bit in recent days, but sulfuric acid is still seeing price increases
The price of sulfuric acid here has dropped a bit, to less than 1,000 yuan per ton.
Where? In Shandong, it’s around 1500.
I agree with your view; there should be more enterprises of type one and two