Thread Content
The United States has adopted currency dumping and creating international instability as its main strategies to address its massive domestic debt problems. It is estimated that oil prices in 2008 will still rise irrationally under the “rational” regulation in the United States. International inflation has been continuously transmitted to China’s economy through international trade. The recent wave of regulatory policies introduced can help mitigate to some extent the impact of international oil prices on China’s prices, but they cannot change the overall trend of increasing profit concentration in industries such as real estate, finance, resources, and energy. The so-called big blue-chip rally might suddenly emerge in the summer. Shortly after the New Year, international crude oil prices exceeded the $100 mark, triggering a \"psychological shock\" in the international economy; strong expectations of global inflation led to a chain reaction. On the surface, high oil prices are the result of turmoil in the international political landscape; however, the core factor behind the sharp rise in oil prices is the policy of dollar depreciation, that is, the struggle to maintain the dollar’s status as the international currency. Faced with twin deficits, in order to maintain the \"confidence value\" of the dollar, the United States, amid the collapse of the gold standard, had no choice but to control the oil resources that are essential to modern society, using these controlled oil resources to sustain the confidence in the intrinsic value of the dollar. Only in this way could dollars, including those in the form of oil dollars, flow around the world and function as a means of payment and a reserve currency. This enabled the United States to effect a large-scale transfer of wealth to its own citizens and treasury by exporting currency and importing wealth, that is, by transferring the surplus value from \"underdeveloped\" countries to American residents and the government through international trade and financial markets. Judging from the current situation, the United States has adopted currency dumping and creating international instability as its main strategies to address its massive domestic debt problems. It is estimated that this strategy will not change significantly before a new president takes office; the factors in the United States that drive up international oil prices will continue to exist, and oil prices will still rise irrationally under the United States’ \"rational\" regulation in 2008. As a result, expectations of rising prices will be further strengthened. Rising oil prices not only directly lead to increased industrial production costs, but also have a more comprehensive and widespread impact on the daily lives of ordinary people. The modern transportation industry is forced to raise fares in order to cover its losses, and such price increases inevitably lead to higher costs for various consumer goods, ultimately driving up the prices of basic necessities and contributing to a general rise in CPI. Rising oil prices will also increase the cost of food production, making it more difficult to control prices. The costs of pesticides, fertilizers, etc. in food production are directly related to oil prices. If food prices fail to keep up with rising production costs, it will continue to hinder improvements in agricultural productivity, especially under the conditions of global warming, when the use of pesticides and fertilizers is expected to increase sharply. Given this global consensus, grain prices in the futures market have continued to rise to record highs or even set new records. On the Chicago futures market, which serves as a barometer for international grain prices, wheat futures prices have recently approached historical highs, while soybean futures prices have reached a new high in 34 years. In Paris, the price of rapeseed rose to a record high, increasing by 1.5% to 444.75 euros per ton, while Malaysian palm oil futures reached a record high of 961 dollars per ton last week. Since grain and rapeseed are key raw materials for biofuels, rising oil prices have exerted a significant upward pressure on the prices of agricultural commodities. With high oil prices, the combined demand for crops for food, feed, and fuel has led to a geometric increase in the demand for agricultural products. The world faces a severe food shortage, yet the development of biofuels continues to grow due to high oil prices. Gürkan, director of the FAO Food Outlook Programme, said that global grain reserves have been declining over the past decade or so, and they currently cover only 57 days of supply. The Barcelona Food Resources Organization says that the food supply is worsening further as many farmers prepare to switch to growing biofuel crops that offer high profits. The International Monetary Fund believes that if the increased use of biofuels continues, using food as a fuel source could have a serious impact on food demand. Global demand for biofuels in 2010 could increase from 10 billion gallons per year in 2005 to 25 billion gallons per year, representing an annual growth rate of 20%. It is evident that high oil prices will inevitably lead to an era of high food prices worldwide; as a result, China will bid farewell to its golden age of low inflation and high growth. With international oil prices under U.S. control, China’s macro-control policies must take into full account the factors involved in international competition, which will weaken the impact of such policy adjustments. Under high oil prices, it is impossible for China’s macro-control to achieve a comprehensive recovery of the agricultural sector solely through pro-agriculture policies. U.S. agriculture is shaped within the context of the international geopolitical landscape; by providing substantial subsidies to its agricultural sector, the U.S. maintains its international competitiveness in this field. This strategy involves raising prices for both food and oil, forcing China, which relies heavily on oil imports and faces challenges in ensuring food security, to bear high costs as a result. As the United States reduces its corn exports, global food and grain prices rise, which in turn increases expectations of higher interest rates and exacerbates the international pressure for the RMB to appreciate. High oil prices will also give rise to panic over an energy crisis, which in turn will inevitably lead to an increase in the demand for oil reserves. This will exacerbate the rise in oil demand in the short term, resulting in an even greater influx of oil dollars. The path for dollar dumping becomes more accessible, thereby creating strong expectations of inflation under the pressures of global dollar dumping and rising prices worldwide. To prevent excessive inflation expectations, China **must use economic, administrative, and legal measures to regulate the market together. The tight monetary policy will become even tighter this spring due to high oil prices; loan limits are likely to be the strictest they have been in a decade, which will exert significant pressure on small and medium-sized enterprises. To counter the urge for the domestic currency to appreciate, raising interest rates will be done more cautiously. Under normal circumstances, the annual interest rate on deposits in commercial banks is around 5.22%, with the maximum expected rate not exceeding 5.49%. The deposit reserve ratio will continue to rise, reaching around 16.5%. Such aggressive monetary policy will inevitably give rise to a Matthew effect: the concentration of profits within an industry will increase, with profits flowing toward the upstream sectors, resource-intensive areas, and monopolistic companies that benefit from such policies, while the profit margins of competitive industries in the downstream sector continue to decline. The author believes that due to the high levels of international oil prices and the prices of means of production, international inflation has been transmitted to China’s economy through international trade. China’s anti-inflation policies, introduced under the pressures of high import prices and low export prices, as well as a continuously declining foreign exchange reserve and an appreciating domestic currency, represent policy adjustments in a contradictory situation. The recent series of policies aimed at eliminating tariffs on imports of resources, raw materials, and energy, as well as imposing export tariffs on certain energy-intensive industries, can help mitigate the impact of international oil prices on prices in our country to some extent, but they cannot change the overall situation. An appreciating local currency and high energy prices will inevitably lead to an increase in the concentration of profits in industries such as real estate, finance, resources, and energy; in other words, 20% of large state-owned enterprises will end up contributing over 80% of the total profits. It is foreseeable that this phenomenon will continue in 2008; the so-called big blue-chip rally will emerge suddenly as summer approaches, thereby providing clear guidelines for investment strategies in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets during 2008, given the high oil prices.