Opinions on the standardization of some old posts on the forum (please express your opinions actively)
Thread Content
Regarding the opinions on the standardization of some old posts in the forum, the recent data upload activity has received strong support from everyone, and a large amount of valuable and meaningful data has completed the forum's database. However, there is also an unpleasant aspect, which is that some duplicate posts are far more standardized and of higher quality than the original posts. Taking into account the long-term development and long-term interests of the forum, the following opinions are hereby made:: 1. Duplicate posts appear in the forum. If the new post is of worse quality than the original post, it will be treated as a duplicate post. 2. For duplicate posts that appear in the forum, such as new posts that are far more standardized and of higher quality than old posts, the old posts will be deleted. At the same time, the deleter will notify the poster of the old post via text message to reply in the report area. The deleter will give bonus points, and the bonus points will not be lower than the points earned by the original post. 3. For a new post that is retained, the retainer will add 2 assets and indicate it in the post. Neither the management team nor the technical team can add points to it, and the scoring power is left to the general members. Attached is a standardized post description.: The description and introduction of the information must be detailed and the clarity should be higher than that of old posts. The cover, table of contents, content, etc. of the information must have screenshots and be easy for everyone to read. We are now soliciting your opinions on this matter and hope you will speak enthusiastically. This post was last edited by Xinzen on 2008-3-1 22:51 ]
It’s a good suggestion to make the font bigger ]
Support activities and forum information need to be standardized! The new information must be better in clarity than the original post ； Clear title, data type, brief description of additional data, various numbers, compilation, and representative description of the data ； Attach necessary screenshots to distinguish the page with a logo ； Attachments must not be smaller than 2mb ； Attach relevant instructions. This post was last edited by Xinzen at 2008-3-1 23:00 ]
Yes, can you make some requirements on the font, size or color of the post?
I also mentioned that some information may be relatively large, so it needs to be divided into dozens of packages. I hope it can be displayed on one floor and cannot be divided into several floors. Posts that are mixed with other posts must be deleted to ensure the continuity of the information posting. In addition, many materials and manuals in our forum will be followed by many posts such as thank you and good information. In fact, as long as the information posts are complete, they can be locked! We can sort out the posts that can be downloaded normally and comply with the regulations, delete some posts, and then lock them. Such posts are information posts that standardize posting. We will give certain rewards to the locked posts and issue announcements hoping that everyone will pay attention to their topic posts!
I think I need to pay more attention to each section and organize the posts carefully so that everyone can learn more.*
Improve resource quality to support ocean and river construction
This is a good job, moderators will handle it as soon as you have time.
Be creative. There will be certain difficulties. For example, after the recycle bin is emptied, there will be no evidence for supplementary scores. It is recommended to consider placing an order in the recycle bin to set up a non-cleared section. These posts will be moved here uniformly, replies and all attachments on the first floor will be deleted, and only the floors with ratings will be retained. These posts will be merged together by the Super Edition on a regular basis regardless of content, which means they have no reading value and have reserved meaning. Similar to the split management method of reporting posts pinned to the top of the entire forum. The significance of the existence of this area will not only be to store old posts that are repeated. Some historical index posts with invalid links and replacements with updated and more complete content can also be moved here. Salary posts, reward posts, etc. can also be considered to be handled in this way. The principle is to retain the original score. Please consider.
There is a loophole here. Whether the post is standardized or not and whether the attachment is clear or not are two different concepts. If the new attachment is clearer than the original attachment, that is, it is not the same version as the original version and is better than the original version, you can consider taking the suggestion of the "147258" moderator ； If the new attachment is the same version as the original attachment, but the attachment size is different, and the posting format is more standardized than the original post, if this kind of post also implements the "147258" moderator's suggestion, then the forum will enter another state. ； In principle, sorting out old posts should be the job of the site managers, and if the forum later builds a VIP area or publishes electronic tabloids, it will also need to compile a good batch of information. For example, the third volume of the book "Chemical Process Design" seems to have more than 100 attachments. These can be compiled by the site into more comprehensive, detailed and concise posts. . . As for the electronic version of PDF, it seems that there is a large number of copies on the Internet, and it is rare to see repeated uploads of books with hundreds of pages. . If it is really a new version, then according to the regulations of the existing forum, it is not considered a duplicate post. In addition, website organization may involve some copyright issues. This is probably also an obstacle for the website to organize information. . The forum should still focus on guiding discussions, and launch special discussions in a timely manner and compile them into volumes, just like the previous installation issues. Such results can be said to be exclusive to the forum and its members. This post was last edited by sophia on 2008-3-4 14:12 ]
For high-quality duplicate posts, is it easier to merge the new posts with the original posts? Clear the original post content and retain the rating.
This is actually a normative issue. Nowadays, the activity area is more standardized, so the posting topics, screenshots, and introductions are relatively complete and standard. In the past, there were some unsatisfactory and irregular places due to historical issues, management standards, etc. However, with the development of the forum, especially the emergence of repeated posts, this issue has become relatively prominent! However, based on the principle of not blaming the past for the law, * * In spirit, previous posts should still be made on a voluntary basis, and it is better for administrators and moderators to remind and suggest rewarding modifications! When dealing with duplicate posts, it is first-come, first-served, and it is better to deal with later posts. If you want to retain later posts, you really need to properly handle the original posts.
There are indeed some old posts that need to be updated! After all, resources are updated very quickly now. I believe many people have encountered this problem. They have a piece of information that they want to upload, but it turns out that it is already on the forum. There are more or less problems, but considering the duplication, it still cannot be uploaded! Now it's great~ Now I can reorganize the resources of the forum! Top! !
Good suggestion, of course I support it! Just have a little doubt: Isn’t it stipulated in the data upload activity that it is not allowed to upload existing materials and books in the forum? Does this suggestion conflict with this provision? Furthermore, if you really want to implement it like the poster, will it be unfair to other members who participate in the data upload activity? for example: Some members uploaded information that the forum did not originally have, while other members uploaded information and books that were already in the forum, but they were more standardized than before.