HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

The main reasons for tower blockage in wet oxidation desulfurization

2008-03-04View Original

Thread Content

There are several aspects: 1. The composition of the gas entering the desulfurization tower is poor, with a high content of impurities (such as fly ash, coal tar, and other solid particles) that clog the packing layer. 2. During the desulfurization reaction in the desulfurization tower, an oxidation-regeneration sulfur precipitation reaction also takes place. If the sulfur that is precipitated (especially when the H2S concentration at the inlet is high) cannot be carried out of the desulfurization tower along with the desulfurization fluid in a timely manner, it can easily accumulate on the surface of the packing, leading to local blockages and uneven flow; in severe cases, this can result in a blockage of the entire tower. 3. The spray density in the desulfurization tower is insufficient. The required value is generally between 50 and 60 m3/m2·h; a lower spray density not only leads to the formation of dry areas in the packing inside the tower, resulting in sulfur blockages, but it also **reduces the purification efficiency of the desulfurization tower. Especially for towers with larger diameters, it is essential to ensure an adequate amount of lean liquid. 4. The amount of air used for regeneration is insufficient, resulting in low blowing intensity (generally, it should be between 50 and 80 m3/m2·h), or the regeneration equipment is not appropriate. This situation inevitably makes it difficult to float sulfur bubbles in the regeneration tank, leading to a high level of suspended sulfur in the lean solution; prolonged operation can easily result in tower blockage. 5. There is a problem with the equipment structure of the desulfurization tower itself. If the filler is not selected properly, or if the structure of the tower’s liquid distributor and redistributor is unsuitable or installed incorrectly, this phenomenon can easily lead to uneven distribution of the solution or the accumulation of sulfur in the distribution channels, thereby causing blockages in the tower. 6. The concentrations of various salts formed as by-products are high; at low temperatures, these salts precipitate and can cause blockages in the tower. Under normal operating conditions, especially in plants with good management (where there are no leaks or spills), an increase in the amount of by-product salts in the desulfurization solution is understandable, as the absorption of H2S by the desulfurization solution involves simultaneous side reactions, which are inevitable. When the amount of by-product salts increases, it is necessary to take timely measures (such as discharging or removing some of the solution to facilitate cooling and crystallization) to prevent salt-related blockages. As for what level constitutes an excess, specific thresholds vary among different companies due to differences in operating conditions. We believe that the amount of by-products should not exceed 250 g/L; in particular, the concentration of Na2SO4 in the solution should generally not exceed 40 g/L. Exceeding these limits is not only a problem related to salt buildup but also leads to severe corrosion of the equipment. 7. Insufficient understanding of sulfur melting production management: shortages of steam for heating lead to the shutdown of sulfur melting equipment; improper operation or issues with the sulfur melting apparatus itself result in an increase in sulfur particles and foam in the residual liquid. Without proper precipitation, filtration, and separation, these substances are returned to the system, eventually causing blockages in the packing inside the tower. 8. Improper control of the components in the desulfurization solution, such as an imbalance in the ratios of tannin and vanadium, leading to the formation of S—O—V precipitates, or inadequate pretreatment of the tannin before it is added to the system. This leads to an increase in the particle size of the desulfurization liquid, making it easier for sulfur to adhere to the filler surfaces. 9. Impact of water quality. Some companies treat hard water, or other types of hard water flow into the sedimentation tanks and then into the system, causing blockages due to calcium, magnesium, and salts. 10. Improper selection of catalysts: We know that different types of catalysts exert varying effects in the catalytic oxidation process. In particular, the crystal structure of elemental sulfur formed after oxidation differs, which in turn affects its viscosity and particle size. If the viscosity of the elemental sulfur that is produced is high, it is essential to consider carefully how this sulfur adheres to the packing material or distributor inside the tower; care must be taken not to neglect any aspect. 11. Sulfur accumulation and blockage in the desulfurization tower demister. This kind of blockage is often overlooked by companies and is also the hardest to detect. Generally, when manufacturers measure the resistance of desulfurization towers, they only measure the pressure difference between the inlet and outlet of the tower. Of course, there are also manufacturers that can measure the pressure difference across each section of the packing. Generally, when a pressure difference is detected in a section of packing, it is determined that that section of packing or distributor is blocked. What is not known is that the reasons for the clogging of the demister are, on the one hand, the lack of cleaning over time, and on the other hand, severe entrainment of air bubbles, which leads to sulfur accumulation and clogging.
Reply #22008-03-05
Very good and comprehensive; it’s worth learning!* Our company has also been facing the problem of high pressure differences in the ADA desulfurization process.
Reply #32008-03-06
In my opinion, the most common form of tower blockage in wet flue gas desulfurization is 1. an insufficient spray density of the solution, which allows sulfur to accumulate on the packing. It is more noticeable when the solution is dirty. 2. The level of by-products is too high, which can lead to precipitation and pipe blockage in winter. 3. The coal quality being too dirty can also cause the level of by-products to rise too rapidly. 4. Clogging of the demister. The others are still not very common.:lol :lol
Reply #42008-03-06
It’s all theoretical; not very practical. It would be better if it were more specific.
Reply #52009-01-01
Actually, this forum is not short of experts; we can also post our questions for everyone to discuss
Reply #62009-01-19
If gas purification is not adequate, with a high content of tar and dust in the gas, it is very easy for the tower to get clogged. Most cases of tower clogging among manufacturers are related to this issue, of course assuming that the hardware used in this process is of good quality.
Reply #72009-07-02
Defects in hardware design are likely the main cause, which should be addressed as much as possible during production. All other issues are secondary causes.
Reply #82009-07-02
Incomplete filtration of wet sulfur, which results in sulfur being carried into the desulfurization tower, is an important reason; other factors include by-products and insufficient spray density.
Reply #92009-07-04
The gas contains many impurities, which causes tower blockage. Furthermore, elemental sulfur cannot be separated, which leads to tower blockage
Reply #102009-07-04
This post was last edited by *aoye613 on 2009-7-6 07:28. 1# zhuqingsong: In our plant, ammonia + 931 is used for desulfurization; before maintenance, the pressure drop was 50 millimeters of mercury. During maintenance, it was found that the demisting layer’s packing was severely clogged, and the liquid distributor was also blocked by dilute sulfur. After maintenance, the pressure drop was only 25 millimeters of mercury. The materials on the first floor are great! Very instructive! Hydrogen sulfide is extremely harmful; sulfur blockages must be eliminated!
Reply #112009-07-12
This post was last edited by ZZJJAA70 on 2009-7-12 at 12:06. The impact of side reaction products on desulfurization ● The accumulation of by-products increases the viscosity of the desulfurization fluid, affecting mass transfer and the formation of sulfur foam. ●The accumulation of by-products will precipitate out of the solution, disrupting normal operating conditions and increasing the resistance in the desulfurization tower; in worse cases, it can completely block the tower and pipelines, bringing production to a standstill. ●Soda ash (ammonia) consumption increases, the washing efficiency of the desulfurization liquid drops sharply, and the sulfur recovery rate declines. ●High concentrations of (NH4)2SO4 can also cause corrosion of carbon steel equipment. High levels of by-products are an important cause of tower blockage. Regarding the issue of high by-products, there are generally two situations. One is normal accumulation, which leads to high levels of by-products ; One type is caused by problems with solution management and handling. This is because, during the reaction in which the desulfurization liquid absorbs H2S, side reactions occur simultaneously, and this is inevitable. All the residue after continuous sulfur melting is returned to the system. This is the result of normal accumulation. I believe that, based on the selection of more mature desulfurization agents, the main factor affecting the stability of the desulfurization system is the continuous increase in side reactions and their resulting by-products. No matter how carefully such reactions are controlled, they are still inevitable; what is considered stability is only short-term stability. The true solution lies in completely eliminating the amount of by-products generated as a result of these inevitable side reactions! The desulfurization solution can be subjected to crude salt (mixed salt) extraction, and the desalted desulfurization solution can be reused. This not only addresses the issue of increased by-products, keeping the content of by-products in the desulfurization solution stable, but also generates economic benefits. Low investment, small land footprint, easy operation – it completely solves the problems of environmental protection and low desulfurization efficiency. Other methods are neither thorough nor free of negative effects; they only provide temporary solutions rather than addressing the root cause. Speak up if you have something to say! My email address is: zhp1389@126.com

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.