HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Hydrofining catalyst

2008-03-05View Original

Thread Content

Which is better for diesel refining, the FH—98 hydrogenation refining catalyst from Fushun Institute or the LH—03 catalyst from Qilu Institute?
Reply #22008-03-05
The Qilu Plant is in better condition. My installation has been in operation for one and a half years, with five shutdowns during that time. Currently, the temperature at the reactor inlet is maintained at 260–270 degrees, with a temperature rise of around 70 degrees; the pressure difference between the reactor inlet and outlet is 0.19 MPa. The sulfur content in refined diesel is below 0.2 mg/g. We think it’s okay
Reply #32008-03-05
The low-temperature activity of LH-03 from Qilu Institute is slightly better than that of FH-98 from Fushun Diesel Refining Institute, while their stability is roughly the same

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.