Advantages and disadvantages of self-circulation and forced circulation in converters
Thread Content
Advantages and disadvantages of self-circulation and forced circulation in converters? Thank you:handshake :handshake :handshake :handshake :handshake :handshake The last edit to this post was made by edc1233 on 2008-9-15 20:45 ]
Heat is carried away by the vaporization latent heat of self-circulating water, while the sensible heat of water is forced to circulate.
The advantages of self-circulation are power savings and uniform heat exchange, while the disadvantages are relatively high water consumption and higher design requirements for the converter.
Self-circulation results in relatively lower power consumption, but since its heat transfer efficiency is inferior to that of forced circulation (especially in back-end converters), it may affect the conversion capacity of the converters to some extent.
Self-circulation is the development direction for the industry in the future. Its advantage in terms of energy savings is unmatched by forced circulation; it not only saves electricity but also thermal energy. It can also be used in combination with lithium bromide
I agree with the view from the 3rd floor. . . . . . :):):lol:D:P
In terms of usage, it comes down to the accumulation of experience; generally, self-circulation should be used as much as possible for converters in the early stages as well as those used in later stages.
Advantages of self-circulation: it reduces the number of hot water pumps required, and the steam generated during conversion can be recycled. Disadvantage: When starting up the conversion system, it is necessary to switch from forced circulation to self-circulation, which increases the labor intensity.