How to compare and choose JX-300XP, ESD100, Hollysys FM
Thread Content
How to compare and choose JX-300XP, ESD100, Hollysys FM scale: It is actually close to 800 points, and after releasing 15% of the margin, there are 900 points.
I am also facing the same problem and hope to communicate with each other! :handshake :handshake :handshake
ECS-100, right? What industry are you in? Chemical engineering? JX-300 is relatively early, and ESC-100 is significantly better than the JX series in terms of system scale and card performance. I am familiar with the hardware of historical MACSV, but I don’t know about FM. Please confirm that you are talking about the system. Hollysys cards are all FM×××. Just confirm it first. To be honest, there is no good or bad DCS, only whether it is suitable or not? Especially among the two domestic companies, one is mainly engaged in chemical industry and the other is mainly engaged in thermoelectricity. Do you have to compare them?
We are in the chemical industry. I’m sure the JX-300X is now obsolete. But what about JX-300XP? How different is it from ECS-100? What's the difference? Hollysys seems to be the two types.: HOLLiAS MACS-F, HOLLiAS MACS-S. Among them, the latter seems to be more advanced
We are in the chemical industry, so this problem is quite a headache. Thank you for your reply. :handshake:handshake
Hollysys MACS-S is used in nuclear power. It’s just that the modules are different, MACS-S is more expensive than MACS-F
I feel that Zhejiang University’s ECS100 is much better than 300XP. 1. The performance of the controller has been significantly enhanced. In the impression, the main control card of 100 already has two CPUs working together, while the 300 has a single CPU. 2. The electrical performance of the card has been significantly enhanced. The AI anti-interference ability in 300 is only 500VAC/MIN. 3. 100 is said to be able to realize the "online download" function after 2006. 4. The configuration software 100 has two software options, which is more flexible.
There is information about ECS-100 in the forum. The hardware indicators of ECS-100 are very outstanding, so outstanding that I can’t believe it. The accuracy of the card is said to be up to 22 bits, and all indicators are very high. However, there is no relevant instructions on G3 and anti-aging, and it is not very clear. The one that was worn first seems to be still a legend. hehe. If compared with MCSV, the advantages of ECS are quite obvious.
Thank you for your replies. I would also like to hear other people’s opinions :). Please feel free to give me your advice.
JX-300XP is the upgrade of the previous JX-300 to 300X and then to 300XP. This series was the main product promoted by Zhejiang University in the past few years. It has many applications. After continuous improvement, the system performance is relatively stable. Moreover, Zhejiang University Hollow has positioned this series for applications that are not too large, with about one or two thousand points. No matter how big it is, you have to choose ECS100. In terms of price, JX-300XP is cheaper. The configuration software seems to be the same version as ECS. The online download of ECS100 is available, but the single-click download is not available. It does not have that function.
How about Hollysys FM? How is the quality and after-sales service of their IO modules? What is the situation mainly in Hangzhou and Lishi?