Should we pay for features of the items we buy that we never use?

2018-07-09View Original

Thread Content

Should we pay for features of the items we buy that we never use?

Reply #22018-07-09

Does that mean we should only buy things that we use regularly?

Reply #32018-07-09

It’s hard to say; for those that can be integrated together, the causal relationship is strong. It can’t be said that just because it’s never been used, there’s no need to pay for it. For example, airbags – having an airbag vs. not having one, or never using an airbag at all – these are different concepts with different natures; whether something is useful or not is relative~~~

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.

Quick Links