Thread Content
This post was last edited by Dingding_PQTO on 2019-1-15 at 21:44. The standard text is on page 5; if you find any errors or issues, please send me an email. Thank you. My email address is dingwei@chengda.com. Students who are interested can scan the QR code to join the group for discussions. Thank you!
No one replied. I had intended to send detailed images, but it seems no one needs them.
For the main text, if you find any errors or anything else, please send me an email. Thank you. My email address is: dingwei@chengda.com
Well, only the encoding method was kept; basically everything else was changed
It has finally moved in the direction of the SEI pipe rack
Not only SEI; several major organizations have been using coding for over a decade
I took a look; I can’t see anything special from a technical perspective. The only question is that it’s only NPS – is this a Chinese standard or an American standard? Adding a DN before NPS will make Chengda Company feel less international? On the one hand, efforts are being made to get Chinese standards recognized abroad; on the other hand, there is an intense economic war with the United States. By establishing a standard centered around the US NPS standard at this time, Chengda Company is perhaps feeling that its reputation isn’t strong enough, and wants to create a big headline to compete in terms of fame with Lenovo Group?