Thread Content
Is it better to develop chemical process design in the design institutes of subsidiaries under state-owned enterprises, or at the BASF Design Center?
Aren’t you just asking for nothing? Can the development of the state-owned company ‘Sun’ be compared to that of global companies?
The state-owned company’s subsidiary holds technical patents, but it only works on domestic projects and is affected by domestic market conditions. BASF’s design company has been in operation for only three years; it appears quite young, and the ins and outs are not clear
BASF’s offices in Shanghai and Chengdu have been in operation for over a decade, while the design company is only 3 years old; its key engineers all have decades of experience in this industry. With BASF’s projects in China such as BYC Phase 3, the Caojing expansion, and the integrated project in Huizhou, Guangdong, there is more than enough opportunity to learn from these projects. Don’t talk to me about technical patents – which of BASF’s plants doesn’t have technical patents?
Senior, I have a question for you. When it comes to chemical process design, working for a foreign company versus a domestic one – aside from the language difference, the technical aspects are similar; there isn’t much of a gap, right?
This post was last edited by The wise are enlightened on 2019-4-4 20:08. State-owned enterprises have a sense of generational gap, while foreign companies are more open.
I even suspect you’re showing off! If you want to learn and grow, go to the BASF Design Center!
No, no. It’s just that I’m not familiar with it, so I’m a bit confused