HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Working principles and efficiencies of different types of graphite heat exchangers and falling film absorbers

2008-07-11View Original

Thread Content

We are now selecting a graphite heat exchanger. We can calculate the heat exchange area, but how should we decide whether to use a tubular type or a plug-and-plate type, and whether to go with circular or square tubes? How do we make this choice? Regarding falling film absorbers, is a tubular type better or a plug-and-perforated type? Which one works better? Please help discuss this.
Reply #22011-01-12
We use shell-and-tube type, and it works well.
Reply #32011-05-22
If the heat exchange area is large, it is recommended to use block-and-hole type exchangers; these are similar to U-tube exchangers. If the area is small, circular tube arrays are a better choice.
Reply #42011-06-24
I’ve seen shell-and-tube types, and they work well

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.