Thread Content
Economic analysis of MTO technology: Here, the economic viability of producing olefins using the MTO process at the natural gas prices in the USGC (U.S. Gulf Coast) as well as at lower natural gas prices (1.0 dollar per million Btu; 1 Btu is a unit of heat energy, with 1 million Btu equaling 1.055 GJ) is compared with that of producing ethylene through conventional methods such as naphtha cracking or ethane cracking. The results are shown in Table 3. Table 3 Comparison of Economic Efficiency in Various Ethylene Production Methods Item MTO1) MTO2) Naphtha Cracking Ethane Cracking Capacity/kt·a-1 303.1 303.1 680.4 680.4 Total Capital Investment/Million USD 321.4 321.4 972.1 456.7 Production Cost/USD·t-1 564.0 218.5 508.3 435.9 Total Cash Cost/USD·t-1 469.4 123.9 384.5 361.9 Variable Cost/USD·t-1 427.7 82.2 324.3 324.0 Raw Materials/USD·t-1 860.0 524.8 824.2 344.6 By-products/USD·t-1 -484.4 -466.7 -604.1 -67.1 Utilities/USD·t-1 52.1 24.1 103.9 46.8 Direct Fixed Costs/USD·t-1 22.9 22.9 26.9 17.4 Allocable Fixed Costs/USD·t-1 18.8 18.8 33.3 20.5 Depreciation/USD·t-1 94.6 94.6 123.8 74.0 10% Return on Investment/USD·t-1 116.5 114.1 158.4 91.6 (Production Cost + 10% Return on Investment)/USD·t-1 680.6 332.6 666.7 527.5
It would be better for the poster to organize the information in a table; it’s difficult to read this way, and it’s not clear either
Great, I exactly need this. Thank you!
Question for the original poster: What do MTO1 and MTO2 refer to?
I also hope the original poster can provide more details regarding MTO1 and MTO2, as there is a significant difference between their variable costs and production costs. If the original poster wants everyone to be able to share it, it would be best to tell them where the data comes from.