“The Red Sea Operation” is absolutely stupid – why go and steal those yellow cakes in the end?
Thread Content
Originally, it was sufficient to simply rescue the Chinese hostages; a few people lost their lives in the process. Fortunately, in the end the hostages were rescued safely, and the mission was completed. It was time to get on the plane and return to the warship. But suddenly, you decided to go and steal those yellow cakes. Is stealing yellow cakes something a soldier should do? Even if those yellow cakes are an important component for making nuclear weapons, it’s not necessary for you to handle such tasks. With the United Nations above and **** below, who do you think you are? You’re a typical example of someone who worries about things that aren’t his concern. The most important thing is to complete the mission as assigned by 007 – that is, to rescue the hostages; that’s something legitimate. But going to steal those yellow cakes in Arab countries counts as robbery, which is unjust. Some Arabs will take advantage of this to criticize China. As a soldier, don’t you know any of this? Moreover, by doing this, you didn’t inform your superiors; it was an unauthorized action on your part. And have you thought about what would happen if one of your three comrades got hurt or died in the process? Don’t you feel guilty? ? ? Really, the more I watch it, the angrier I get. I don’t know how the director managed to turn what could have been a great patriotic gunfight movie into something in the style of 007. Once again, it’s about worrying about things that aren’t one’s concern and doing things that are supposed to be done by 007 agents
Is that it once the hostages are rescued? Can this hostage-taker just get away?
Never forget our original aspirations and cherish peace. For world peace, Chinese soldiers go forward without hesitation.
It’s just a movie; watch it and think about it, there’s no need to get angry
It’s really just a movie. Let me explain what a soldier’s duties are. It’s not pleasant to say, but it’s the truth: 1. Soldiers act based on orders; they must not take any action on their own without orders. 2. Soldiers are focused on completing their tasks, and to do so they can ignore any other matters, including any indirect consequences. 3. To maintain secrecy, soldiers will eliminate anyone or anything in their path. If a hostage was left alive, the only reason for that is that the mission was to rescue hostages, and that hostage was the one who survived. Looking at the operation in the Red Sea alone, it’s either because the director and screenwriters have no experience in military life, or it’s because our actual capabilities are too poor. 1. When the attack occurred, the captain was constantly assigning combat tasks. For a special forces unit, what they do most of all on a daily basis is training, and the content of that training focuses on emergency response. In other words, they know what has happened, what each player should do, and when to do it. If everyone waits for the captain to make decisions, what happens if the captain is unavailable or unable to issue orders temporarily? Wouldn’t such a team then exist in name only? 2. In case of an emergency, the captain will issue commands, but these commands are directional in nature. For example: counterattack, patience, silence, retreat, and so on. Once this directional instruction is given, the team members will know what to do and how to do it. 3. The captain also needs to give guiding instructions. For example, if the objectives of a mission are hindered, the team leader needs to adjust tactics – deciding which targets to attack first and altering the route, among other things. So, many people compare \"Red Sea Operation\" with \"Wolf Warrior.\" In my opinion, \"Wolf Warrior\" is a fun movie; after all, as long as it’s entertaining, that’s enough – the director’s goal has been achieved. It was shot very well; a success. “The Red Sea Operation” is a war film; ignoring the details and focusing on the plot, it’s quite good ； In terms of specific details, the director and screenwriter aren’t at the highest level, but these are still some of the best films released recently. In terms of both box office performance and critical reception, it’s good – a success.
This post was last edited by lovelife1997 on 2019-12-10 at 15:58. Hehe. . . Hehe
One can even spot problems while watching a movie; it’s supposed to be a form of entertainment, but instead it turns into a source of frustration. Typical of someone incompetent in technology – and completely oblivious to their own mistakes