Talk about the adverse selection phenomenon in your organization!
Thread Content
Reverse selection, in short, means that the bad eliminate the good, the inferior eliminate the superior, the vile eliminate the noble, the mediocre eliminate the outstanding, and so on. Such tragedies have occurred throughout history time and again: Li Bai had no choice but to travel and enjoy the scenery, Tao Yuanming was forced to work as a farmer, and Qu Yuan was compelled to throw himself into the Miluo River – all of these are examples of negative selection. But at the same time, another view holds that the phenomenon of reverse selection actually reflects the core idea of evolution theory, namely \"survival of the fittest\" – only those who can adapt to their environment can avoid being eliminated, rather than it being the strong ones who survive. Please share about yourselves and what’s going on around you, and let’s have some fun together. :lol
It is the phenomenon of \"bad money driving out good money,\" which depends mainly on corporate leaders and the orientation of corporate culture.
Among the three laws of Western management, Parkinson’s Law is considered to be the worst discovery. An mediocre leader, in order to maintain his position, uses two subordinates who are even more mediocre than himself; those subordinates then use even more mediocre people under them. As a result, in such an organization, the inferior replaces the better. The problem is that now this situation also exists in the field of science – those old, mediocre individuals who rely on seniority drive young scientists abroad
Indeed, there are many such cases of reverse selection. To be honest, Li Bai was good at writing poems, but he might really not be suitable for politics
If you can’t change the status quo, it’s better to change the environment. Take one step forward, and the world opens up!
It’s not common to be forced to leave because one can’t stay. Those with greater talent who feel that they can achieve better things on their own decide to resign voluntarily; this isn’t considered expulsion. Those who are relatively less competent stay and continue to work for their employer, and they can’t be regarded as the ones who have driven away the more talented individuals
That is the ideal situation; in reality, it’s often not like that.
Are all those who left and ran away dead? They might have found better platforms; those who stay are not necessarily the best, and their methods of planning and management may not be the most rational. Otherwise, why do so many companies fail after existing for only a short time?