Thread Content
I would like to ask everyone: should the construction organization plan prepared by the design firm be detailed, or should it consist only of general principles? For example, in a construction plan, it must be prepared by the construction company in order to be detailed enough for practical use; if it is prepared by the design company itself, it can only be pieced together haphazardly and cannot provide guidance for actual operations.
Check the standards; it’s clear. This post was last edited by bingyu252 on 2009-1-15 at 12:35.]
What is written according to standards can only be principle-based matters, and it holds no significance for actual construction. In my opinion, it’s difficult to create a construction plan that is useful for actual implementation, as those who work in design may not necessarily be very familiar with the specifics of how construction is carried out
Reference standard HG20235-93 Standard for Construction Organization Design of Chemical Engineering Projects
Since it’s a general contract, there will surely be subcontracts. Find a partner and have them help you write it first; if they win the bid later, it will definitely be done for free. If they don’t win the bid, paying them some money should be fine. After all, it’s still up to you to decide whether they win or not
It should be written in accordance with the unit’s standard format and requirements regarding the depth of content. The main structures of various design institutes are similar, but there are still differences among them; one should not merely follow the regulatory requirements, but must also comply with the requirements outlined in the appendix of each organization’s quality system