Thread Content
I took a look at the online time for October, and it turned out that some people were online an average of 8 hours per day. I think that’s too much; it should affect their normal work and life. Therefore, I suggest that the assessment of online time should be more humane, which would be better for the development of the forum.
Almost a professional at this point; P This attitude is worth learning from*:handshake, but it shouldn’t affect work and daily life
Hehe, before online time was taken into account in the scoring formula and used as a criterion for evaluating moderators, many users had astonishing levels of online time, probably achieved through certain web tools.
Others can also use the Internet during working hours. Those like us can only access the Internet in our free time, and we still insist on spending three to four hours online every day – it’s exhausting!
In fact, online time is just a basic factor; what’s important is for the moderators and senior moderators to work together to rate members’ discussions in a timely manner, and to encourage members to participate more actively in the forum. That way, one can have a clear conscience. This post was last edited by limingshuguang on 2008-11-11 at 10:46
It’s time to consider health issues; everyone should take care of their bodies
According to the forum’s scoring rules, being online for 3 hours a day is already quite good; I’ve also noticed that some people can stay online for 12 hours per day on average, which is truly amazing! It’s also possible for multiple people to use the same account to complete it.
Agree with the person above; it’s indeed possible. If each unit specializes in a particular area, it’s possible to use one account while keeping the account active even when the person is not using it.
These quantitative indicators are merely for reference; as for how well things are done, it is clear to the members and moderators of each subforum if they pay close attention