The income and status of entertainers
Thread Content
What is the average income of entertainers in terms of its position in society? Is their income matched to their social status? What do everyone think?
It’s not balanced – entertainers’ earnings do not correspond to their efforts, and they bring no positive benefits to society!
Artists should be classified as freelancers. Their income is earned through their own abilities and skills. What is successful and recognized by the public commands high earnings. If it doesn’t work, one can only be eliminated. As for their income status, it is the result of their own efforts. They are also contributing to **tax payments. Regarding what they have done for society, it’s the taxes they pay and the spiritual joy they bring to people,,, If focusing on their income is the case, then it can only be described as envy, jealousy, and a hatred towards those who are wealthy. I ask, what would the conclusion be if we considered things from another perspective?
It’s all about materialism in the end!
According to the law of value, artists bring in high box office revenues; while you scientists manage to send a rocket to Mars – how much money do you earn from that? ;P
In the capital market, earning 100 million generates at least an economic benefit of 1 billion – who would engage in a loss-making deal? Except for economic crimes
It’s still the fan economy; such a fan economy is abnormal
As long as it is income earned through labor, legitimate earnings are subject to taxation as required; both status and income are well-deserved!