A layman managing an expert

This one. . . . Buddha said it’s hard to say

Having such thoughts means not recognizing one’s supervisor; it’s a desire to overthrow the leader and take their place: lol. It’s fine to discuss whether someone is an expert or not, but discussing management skills is another matter. In fact, Han Xin believed that the more troops one had, the better. Let’s see what Liu Bang had to say… When it comes to leading troops, he is not as good as Han Xin; when it comes to governing the country and ensuring its security, he is not as good as Xiao He or Zhang Liang. So, can we say that Liu Bang was an amateur at management but an expert in other areas? The owners of the private companies where I work are mostly amateurs; then why aren’t the professionals in charge? ? ? ? :Lol, I’d advise you to just be yourself – that’s the best thing to do. One day, when you’re in a leadership position, you’ll understand it.

An outsider can also manage experts; the key is to see how they use those experts to get things done

Look at what this amateur is in charge of. If it’s professional matters, then they are definitely an amateur; but if it involves coordinating staff, allocating resources, and providing overall support, then they’re not an amateur at all, but rather an expert in management

It’s all managed by experts, there’s no communication between different industries, resources can’t be utilized, and nothing can get done