Please take good care of the layout management for this section – score carefully
Thread Content
Please take charge of the management of this section, combining leadership with evaluation tasks. Coordinate the evaluation standards for this section with the section leader, and ensure that the moderators of this section work together in a cooperative manner. The moderator in charge of this section (the one listed first) should handle coordination tasks, and any issues should be reported to the section leader promptly. —the section leader is the overall person in charge of the section, while the forum moderator plays a role in coordinating the moderators of that forum; any issues should be reported to the section leader promptly. ——– Score carefully: Your score reflects both your level of approval and your knowledge level. The scoring criteria can be found at http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-29061-1-1.html. Starting from now, those who wish to apply for the real* moderator status must be at least in the fifth grade of elementary school and have accumulated over 100 hours of online time. Please ask the section leaders to conduct stricter reviews in order to improve the quality of moderator management
I fully agree with the approach of \"management as the primary factor, with ratings playing a secondary role.\" Look at some moderators – their ratings can be in the thousands, while their management score is only in the hundreds; it’s an unhealthy management style!
Well, I’ll strengthen management from now on and strive to be a competent moderator!
Putting aside the number of times management is carried out, moderators don’t focus primarily on scores; \"Be cautious when giving scores – your ratings reflect both your level of approval and your knowledge.\" I think this is a bit extreme, after all, even experts can’t master all the knowledge available； Moreover, a single forum thread covers such a wide range of knowledge; if only those discussions that can be accurately rated are given scores, many other discussions will end up without any ratings. Remember, the goal of Haichuan is to create a forum focused on technical discussions. If moderators focus solely on management and only rate those discussions that can be accurately assessed, it will inevitably result in many discussions remaining unrated. I remember when I was younger, I would post discussions in the hope of getting points so that I could upgrade my status and download more materials. Therefore, this issue needs further discussion. This post was last edited by limingshuguang on 2008-12-11 at 19:43
Finally, I’ve gotten the boss’s orders. I’ve always said that too many ratings aren’t good – there are so many posts that don’t even deserve to be rated
Score carefully – your score reflects both your level of approval and your knowledge level:victory: Approval means giving points; it also shows your views on management concepts:lol
“Score carefully – your score reflects both your level of approval and your knowledge level. I fully agree with this, but I think the analysis in post 5 makes quite a lot of sense. If ratings are given only to discussions that one approves of, then many discussions will not receive any ratings at all, and the popularity of the forum sections will surely be affected as well.
Strongly in favor; scoring is secondary, management is primary
I think moderators should give more ratings. . Of course, this mainly refers to the number of times ratings are given; as for the score value, it depends on the quality, since ordinary members rate others too rarely. . If the moderators don’t rate more, many people’s enthusiasm will be greatly affected. The popularity of the forum will be greatly affected. Everyone has a different level of knowledge and different experiences and insights. As long as the responses are well-reasoned, even if they aren’t the standard answers, some points should still be given to encourage enthusiasm!
I also fully agree with the management principle of \"management as the primary focus, with evaluation as a supplementary element,\" and strive to implement it as much as possible. However, I think this principle should also be viewed from two perspectives: for those forums that don’t have much popularity or a limited scope of industries, it will be difficult to motivate users to post more content unless the scoring system is appropriately strengthened! Of course, we firmly oppose the approach of neglecting management and using grading as the only means of management!
Driven by the passion to \"support Haichuan and serve everyone\" and the determination to contribute my part to Haichuan, I have just applied for the position of moderator for the environmental protection area. I realize there’s still a lot I need to learn from everyone*; please feel free to point out any mistakes!