HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Minimum effective thickness of the expansion joint after molding

2009-01-23View Original

Thread Content

In the calculations for the expansion joint of SW-6, there is a parameter known as the minimum effective thickness Sp after the expansion joint is formed. I carried out the calculations, and the result obtained for SP did not take into account any additional thickness loss; it only accounted for the thinning that occurs during the forming process. My question is: why is it still called effective thickness?
Reply #22009-02-12
You don’t need to worry about this; the design formulas and charts for expansion joints are backed by thousands of experiments on the failure of such joints. During these experiments, the thickness of the materials used to manufacture the expansion joints exhibited both positive and negative deviations.
Reply #32011-06-07
When calculating, it is sufficient to consider the nominal thickness; other factors have already been taken into account in the formulas.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.