Do people engaged in chemical engineering technology need to have good character?
Thread Content
Let us discuss the question "Do people engaged in chemical engineering technology need to have good character?" Because many people are promoted and become managers in the process of engaging in technology. In the process of management, people play a decisive factor. Can people with poor character take on management or technical responsibilities? Can a team led by such a leader still fight a tough battle?
It is a common phenomenon to develop from a technical person to a manager. Problems with the character of technical people may not affect their work, but from a management perspective, it is different. It will have a certain impact and even hinder the development of the team. Likewise, this process mirrors the high-level aspects from the side. I hope the top management can appoint people on their merits. A wise man thinks of a wise king!
Doing anything requires good character.
As mentioned on the third floor, everything must be done with character, especially managers.
Haha, you need to have good character in everything you do!
I support the views on the 2nd and 3rd floors. Years of experience have proven that good character can ultimately help you succeed!
That's it. To do anything, you need good character. This is how we see it. For managers, how to select the right talents? The story of King Zhuang of Chu identifying people who speak outspokenly and Marquis Wen of Wei identifying people of high virtue may provide managers with some useful lessons. However, some management studies have shown that: The profitability of the company has nothing to do with the character of the manager, but managers with high character often have no successors or their successors deteriorate in management. I also feel that managers with bad character often inspire passion and creativity in their subordinates, which is like the catfish effect. In addition, if you want to become successful, you also need such hardships. In fact, your leadership character may not be what you think. Reprinted below: Later, the teacher "Duxingnao" and the teacher "Huaxia Shangqi" had a wonderful dialogue, in which they talked about: “When recruiting a salesperson, should you choose his or her character or ability? ”“"Huaxia Shangqi" I agree very much with the teacher's answer, "Actually, there is a certain error in this choice. Why?" Because if he is capable, he will not let you control me. Why should I ask you to control me if I am capable? So managers will think that this kind of person's character is not good. Is it really his character that is not good? Of course the incompetent and honest person is of good character, and he is under your control. ” This is indeed the case. Those who are capable will definitely not submit to supervision, and those who are incompetent can only be controlled by others. But think about it, is it really the choice between character and ability? As a manager, shouldn’t we examine ourselves? This post was last edited by Xiaoxiaojianghu on 2009-2-3 08:25 ]
No matter what you do, you need good character
"You need good character to do anything." What’s more, a manager? ! :)
The brothers above are right, you must have good quality and moral character in everything you do.
The roles of technology and management are not easy to agree on in many situations. Both technology and managers require character and quality. The roles of technicians and managers are just different, but the general direction is the same. But the character of the manager is important.
If you don’t have a good character, it will be difficult for you to take up a leadership position. Even in a leadership position, it will be difficult for you to last for a long time. A bad character will affect your team and no one will support you.
Good character is a must at that time, not to mention that as a manager, everything you do affects the people around you. I don’t know why you would ask such a question!