initial thermal displacement

Just use method one. Method two using CNODE is mostly used in places where equipment settles, for example. This is unnecessary.

Personally, I feel that 1 and 2 mean the same thing. The additional displacement of the endpoint is 0, which means it is fixedly constrained. The component with a displacement of 0 must be entered as 0, otherwise it will be regarded as unconstrained. The following are the running results of two settings of a steam pipeline. The displacement and load are consistent, indicating that 1 and 2 mean the same thing. Among them, 200 is the constraint point CAESAR II DISPLACEMENT REPORT FILE: CASE 3 (OPE) W+D1+T1+P1+H+CS DATE:FEB 6,2009 --------Translations(mm.)--- --------Rotations(deg.)--------- NODE DX DY DZ RX RY RZ 10 -36.700 -3.000 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 19 -78.160 -5.125 0.663 -0.0581 0.0136 -0.0102 20 -81.602 -13.052 1.969 -0.0692 0.0233 -0.0040 28 -81.626 -18.325 2.860 -0.0769 0.0301 0.0001 29 -81.281 -25.654 7.715 -0.0905 0.0406 0.0068 30 -80.371 -27.191 16.428 -0.0980 0.0494 0.0150 35 -47.058 4.826 136.443 -0.1067 0.1983 0.1440 38 -42.025 7.425 146.990 -0.1039 0.2137 0.1553 39 -34.643 10.502 153.276 -0.0910 0.2267 0.1641 40 -24.882 14.210 152.271 -0.0667 0.2384 0.1634 49 44.587 35.739 110.435 0.1481 0.2515 0.1397 50 50.399 28.798 105.574 0.1693 0.2409 0.1307 58 65.758 -39.812 70.837 0.2456 0.1677 0.0653 59 68.146 -49.688 69.598 0.2442 0.1594 0.0582 60 71.456 -57.446 75.733 0.2345 0.1526 0.0500 68 86.537 -77.801 123.950 0.1384 0.1188 -0.0001 69 88.646 -83.653 130.886 0.1389 0.1138 -0.0084 70 89.281 -92.724 131.552 0.1471 0.1080 -0.0152 80 79.092 -187.682 97.742 0.1178 0.0361 -0.0724 90 89.087 28.886 -184.819 0.1178 0.0361 -0.0724 100 82.910 -4.857 -192.019 0.0609 0.0102 -0.0851 109 78.824 -0.913 -92.164 -0.0930 -0.0319 -0.1262 110 76.210 -8.181 -87.096 -0.0970 -0.0344 -0.1288 118 62.416 -52.640 -74.976 -0.1479 -0.0486 -0.1380 119 59.467 -59.415 -68.786 -0.1647 -0.0512 -0.1389 120 57.431 -59.502 -59.486 -0.1820 -0.0532 -0.1398 130 53.432 -45.378 -28.597 -0.1944 -0.0580 -0.1435 140 52.106 -41.208 -18.803 -0.1721 -0.0589 -0.1447 150 51.849 -40.467 -16.920 -0.1684 -0.0590 -0.1449 160 50.768 -37.381 -9.009 -0.1684 -0.0590 -0.1449 170 50.253 -35.934 -5.242 -0.1632 -0.0591 -0.1454 178 50.201 -35.792 -4.865 -0.1627 -0.0591 -0.1454 179 45.796 -31.771 2.672 -0.1482 -0.0589 -0.1473 180 37.356 -27.954 4.905 -0.1278 -0.0570 -0.1457 189 2.474 -15.904 0.850 -0.0372 -0.0276 -0.0486 190 -0.196 -7.610 0.164 -0.0182 -0.0141 -0.0223 200 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6001 -68.193 -2.122 0.036 -0.0440 0.0058 -0.0162 6002 -80.170 -26.794 18.161 -0.0980 0.0512 0.0169 6003 -66.156 -7.094 85.966 -0.1224 0.1298 0.0897 6004 -24.769 14.253 152.209 -0.0663 0.2385 0.1633 6005 24.203 32.421 123.099 0.0862 0.2632 0.1569 6006 50.740 27.668 105.128 0.1717 0.2397 0.1295 6007 60.123 -8.909 87.936 0.2276 0.2007 0.0928 6008 88.855 -102.477 128.122 0.1558 0.1006 -0.0225 6009 82.933 -162.748 105.564 0.1501 0.0550 -0.0603 6010 83.098 -6.871 -167.910 0.0157 -0.0031 -0.0951 6011 81.018 -1.363 -111.029 -0.0876 -0.0266 -0.1187 6012 75.081 -11.948 -86.241 -0.0991 -0.0356 -0.1298 6013 56.917 -57.719 -55.342 -0.1889 -0.0540 -0.1403 6014 52.720 -43.059 -23.324 -0.1829 -0.0585 -0.1442 6015 16.260 -21.648 2.387 -0.0740 -0.0437 -0.0999 CAESAR II RESTRAINT REPORT FILE: CASE 3 (OPE) W+D1+T1+P1+H+CS DATE:FEB 6,2009 ------Forces(N. )------ ------Moments(Nm )------ NODE FX FY FZ MX MY MZ TYPE 200 413. -6107. 3450. -40523. -23109. -47357. Rigid ANC 10 -413. -3653. -3450. -17454. -4203. -13602. Displ. Reaction 6001 0. -17794. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design VSH 6002 0. -38066. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design VSH 6003 0. -46629. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design CSH 6004 0. -38588. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design CSH 6005 0. -21134. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design CSH 6006 0. -18958. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design CSH 6007 0. -53391. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design CSH 6008 0. -47847. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design CSH 6009 0. -58104. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design CSH 6010 0. -26362. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design CSH 6011 0. -27385. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design VSH 6012 0. -37726. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design VSH 6013 0. -2590. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design VSH 6014 0. -43976. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design VSH 6015 0. -37440. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design VSH is replaced by endpoint additional displacement CAESAR II DISPLACEMENT REPORT FILE: CASE 3 (OPE) W+D1+T1+P1+H+CS DATE:FEB 6,2009 --------Translations(mm.)- --------Rotations(deg.)--------- NODE DX DY DZ RX RY RZ 10 -36.700 -3.000 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 19 -78.160 -5.125 0.663 -0.0581 0.0136 -0.0102 20 -81.602 -13.052 1.969 -0.0692 0.0233 -0.0040 28 -81.626 -18.325 2.860 -0.0769 0.0301 0.0001 29 -81.281 -25.654 7.715 -0.0905 0.0406 0.0068 30 -80.371 -27.191 16.428 -0.0980 0.0494 0.0150 35 -47.058 4.826 136.443 -0.1067 0.1983 0.1440 38 -42.025 7.425 146.990 -0.1039 0.2137 0.1553 39 -34.643 10.502 153.276 -0.0910 0.2267 0.1641 40 -24.882 14.210 152.271 -0.0667 0.2384 0.1634 49 44.587 35.739 110.435 0.1481 0.2515 0.1397 50 50.399 28.798 105.574 0.1693 0.2409 0.1307 58 65.758 -39.812 70.837 0.2456 0.1677 0.0653 59 68.146 -49.688 69.598 0.2442 0.1594 0.0582 60 71.456 -57.446 75.733 0.2345 0.1526 0.0500 68 86.537 -77.801 123.950 0.1384 0.1188 -0.0001 69 88.646 -83.653 130.886 0.1389 0.1138 -0.0084 70 89.281 -92.724 131.552 0.1471 0.1080 -0.0152 80 79.092 -187.682 97.742 0.1178 0.0361 -0.0724 90 89.087 28.886 -184.819 0.1178 0.0361 -0.0724 100 82.910 -4.857 -192.019 0.0609 0.0102 -0.0851 109 78.824 -0.913 -92.164 -0.0930 -0.0319 -0.1262 110 76.210 -8.181 -87.096 -0.0970 -0.0344 -0.1288 118 62.416 -52.640 -74.976 -0.1479 -0.0486 -0.1380 119 59.467 -59.415 -68.786 -0.1647 -0.0512 -0.1389 120 57.431 -59.502 -59.486 -0.1820 -0.0532 -0.1398 130 53.432 -45.378 -28.597 -0.1944 -0.0580 -0.1435 140 52.106 -41.208 -18.803 -0.1721 -0.0589 -0.1447 150 51.849 -40.467 -16.920 -0.1684 -0.0590 -0.1449 160 50.768 -37.381 -9.009 -0.1684 -0.0590 -0.1449 170 50.253 -35.934 -5.242 -0.1632 -0.0591 -0.1454 178 50.201 -35.792 -4.865 -0.1627 -0.0591 -0.1454 179 45.796 -31.771 2.672 -0.1482 -0.0589 -0.1473 180 37.356 -27.954 4.905 -0.1278 -0.0570 -0.1457 189 2.474 -15.904 0.850 -0.0372 -0.0276 -0.0486 190 -0.196 -7.610 0.164 -0.0182 -0.0141 -0.0223 200 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6001 -68.193 -2.122 0.036 -0.0440 0.0058 -0.0162 6002 -80.170 -26.794 18.161 -0.0980 0.0512 0.0169 6003 -66.156 -7.094 85.966 -0.1224 0.1298 0.0897 6004 -24.769 14.253 152.209 -0.0663 0.2385 0.1633 6005 24.203 32.421 123.099 0.0862 0.2632 0.1569 6006 50.740 27.668 105.128 0.1717 0.2397 0.1295 6007 60.123 -8.909 87.936 0.2276 0.2007 0.0928 6008 88.855 -102.477 128.122 0.1558 0.1006 -0.0225 6009 82.933 -162.748 105.564 0.1501 0.0550 -0.0603 6010 83.098 -6.871 -167.910 0.0157 -0.0031 -0.0951 6011 81.018 -1.363 -111.029 -0.0876 -0.0266 -0.1187 6012 75.081 -11.948 -86.241 -0.0991 -0.0356 -0.1298 6013 56.917 -57.719 -55.342 -0.1889 -0.0540 -0.1403 6014 52.720 -43.059 -23.324 -0.1829 -0.0585 -0.1442 6015 16.260 -21.648 2.387 -0.0740 -0.0437 -0.0999 CAESAR II RESTRAINT REPORT FILE: CASE 3 (OPE) W+D1+T1+P1+H+CS DATE:FEB 6,2009 ------Forces(N. )------- ------Moments(Nm )------ NODE FX FY FZ MX MY MZ TYPE 10 -413. -3653. -3450. -17454. -4203. -13602. Displ. Reaction 200 413. -6107. 3450. -40523. -23109. -47357. Displ. Reaction 6001 0. -17794. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design VSH 6002 0. -38066. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design VSH 6003 0. -46629. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design CSH 6004 0. -38588. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design CSH 6005 0. -21134. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design CSH 6006 0. -18958. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design CSH 6007 0. -53391. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design CSH 6008 0. -47847. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design CSH 6009 0. -58104. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design CSH 6010 0. -26362. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design CSH 6011 0. -27385. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design VSH 6012 0. -37726. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design VSH 6013 0. -2590. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design VSH 6014 0. -43976. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design VSH 6015 0. -37440. 0. 0. 0. 0. Prog Design VSH

Come and learn* La, I am looking at stress analysis information, :), asjfasnnfn

There is so much content in it, and I learned a lot of knowledge.