Thread Content
I would like to ask experts, how to compare the advantages and disadvantages of two sets of heavy oil catalytic cracking units? In what aspects are the comparisons mainly made?
1. Use the same raw material. . . Unique process parameters and control methods. . . Common energy recovery measures. . . Then look at the product distribution and comprehensive liquid collection level, which is the level of design. . . 2. A common raw material. . . common control parameters. . . Different regenerators use the same catalyst. . . Look at product distribution and liquid collection levels as well as product quality indicators. . . Evaluate the quality of the catalytic process or the quality of the catalyst. . . 3. A common raw material. . . common control parameters. . . The same regenerator type is used with different catalysts. . . Look at product distribution and liquid collection levels as well as product quality indicators. . . Evaluate the quality of the catalytic process or the quality of the catalyst. . . Wait :lol
I didn't make it clear and the person upstairs misunderstood me. I'm sorry! What I want to compare are energy consumption, product distribution, coke yield and other items. Every device has its own value. I want to find out its own advantages, not through experiments, but through daily data calculations. But I don't know how to compare them. Ask the experts for advice.