Thread Content
The formaldehyde production process of Perstorp Formox in Sweden is widely used in China! ! Which domestic design institutes deal with formaldehyde?
There are some facilities using the iron-molybdenum method for formaldehyde production in China; the Southwest Research Institute has conducted research in this area, but most of these facilities rely on foreign technology
The main design institutes in China responsible for constructing the PERSTORP FORMOX ferro-molybdenum process formaldehyde plant are Xi’an Hualu (6th Chemical Engineering Institute) and Chengda (8th Chemical Engineering Institute)
Hehe, if it’s the electrolytic silver method, I can help you get in touch with several design firms that we work with regularly; their design fees are very low – just a few tens of thousands
Our institute can offer advanced paraformaldehyde production technology; for formaldehyde production, only the electrolytic silver method is available, which results in high methanol consumption and a low formaldehyde concentration of only 37%. PERSTORP FORMOX formaldehyde technology is quite good.
Foreign formaldehyde treatment technologies are very expensive. If the domestic ones work well, buying a few more sets will still be cheaper than using foreign solutions
Xi’an Hualu (Chemical Industry Sixth Institute) has done a large part of the work, and it has a decent reputation.
You can contact me for the design of silver products; I have experience in design and production, and I have worked on as well as am currently working on large-scale projects. 13583393143
The Sixth Chemical Research Institute is pretty good; the Southwest Institute has carried out feasibility studies
Those from the Sixth Institute of Original Chemistry can contact me. Our company plans to launch a formaldehyde-related project!
Our institute has carried out many designs using the silver method, including overall contracting for equipment manufacturing and commissioning; feel free to contact me at 13812284019 if you are interested.
The iron-molybdenum method is still better; it produces fewer impurities and virtually no separation is required