Radiometric level gauge
Thread Content
What are the differences between cesium and cobalt as sources in radioactive level gauges?
You’ll know by checking the materials on these two links! http://bbs.hcbbs.com/viewthread.php?tid=264459&highlight=%B7%C5%C9%E4%D0%D4%D2%BA%CE%BB%BC%C6 http://bbs.hcbbs.com/viewthread.php?tid=264348&highlight=%B7%C5%C9%E4%D0%D4%D2%BA%CE%BB%BC%C6
I’ve read it, but there’s very little discussion on the advantages and disadvantages of cobalt and cesium respectively, as well as their areas of application. Is there any more detailed information available?
Use radar; it has no radiation and offers high safety levels.
Hehe, that costs money, buddy – it’s not that easy to pull money out of the boss’s pocket;P
Ah! What a pity! The radioactive level gauges made of cobalt that we use here require operators with insufficient skills, and to some extent they fail to meet the needs of actual production. At present, the level gauges in our CO2 stripping towers are something that our operators have had to figure out gradually through actual production – it’s truly sad! If I were the boss, I’d just fire those gauge readers! ! ! It’s absolutely infuriating! ! ! ! ! !
Thank you for sharing; it has given me a deeper understanding of radioactive level gauges
The radiation intensity varies; the intensity of cesium-137 is lower. If the walls of the device are thick, a higher radiation intensity is required, in which case cobalt-60 is generally used