Why don’t some companies hire graduates from previous years?
Thread Content
What are the reasons for not recruiting former students?
1. Fresh graduates are more obedient and organized. 2. Fresh graduates ask for less money. 3. Fresh graduates are young. 4. If experienced employees do not have the right qualifications, they will need to be retrained anyway; it’s better to hire fresh graduates. 5. Hiring fresh graduates helps solve employment problems and is beneficial in many aspects such as taxes, as there are preferential policies available.
What does \"previous graduates\" mean? Have you worked before or not?
What does \"previous graduates\" mean? The original poster isn’t clear about this. If it refers to those who have yet to find a job, well, employers would surely be concerned about their capabilities; otherwise, how could they remain unemployed for a year or even longer? If you have work experience, employers generally appreciate it, especially if it is relevant to the position. But if it’s across different industries, it’s understandable that they wouldn’t want you – usually you get rejected at the HR department stage, let alone have your resume reach a supervisor
When the HR department there heard that I was a former graduate student, they said they didn’t hire such candidates. But I already have a job; I just want to change jobs... My field of study is also completely relevant... It seems, as the person above said, that they think I’m a former graduate student who has been unable to find a job for a long time
Previous students have certain mental patterns that are difficult to change
The company still needs skilled people; recent graduates have little experience and are además very arrogant. This is the main reason
It seems like the person upstairs didn’t understand what the original poster meant……
Many companies prefer to train their own employees, as fresh graduates are more malleable
Previous graduates are not good at handling humble tasks: lol