HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

What are the models of deaeration heads? Which one is better?

2009-02-10View Original

Thread Content

Our catalytic unit’s deaerator consumes a significant amount of steam, around 3 tons per hour, or 3 kilograms of steam per hour; all of this deaeration steam is vented, which is a great waste. I was thinking about whether it could be modified. What are the models of deaeration heads? Which one is better?
Reply #22009-02-10
Our catalytic unit’s deaerator consumes a significant amount of steam, around 3 tons per hour, or 3 kilograms of steam per hour; all of this deaeration steam is vented, which is a great waste. I was thinking about whether it could be modified. What are the models of deaeration heads? Which one is better?
Reply #32009-02-10
Our catalytic unit’s deaerator consumes a significant amount of steam, around 3 tons per hour, or 3 kilograms of steam per hour; all of this deaeration steam is vented, which is a great waste. I was thinking about whether it could be modified. What are the models of deaeration heads? Which one is better?
Reply #42009-02-15
The most commonly used types of deaerators at present are the packed spray type and the rotating film spray type. The amount of steam consumed is related to the quality of atomization, depending on the structure of the deaeration head; the atomization effect of the rotary film spray type is slightly better ; But it mainly relates to your coordinated automatic control of steam and water, as well as the coordination with the exhaust pressure. Based on the several automatic control upgrades for deaerators that I have carried out in the past, as long as you choose the appropriate steam electric control valves and water electric control valves, and employ progressive control based on multiple parameters such as temperature and exhaust pressure, it is entirely possible to reduce energy consumption by around 15% by keeping the temperature of the deaerated water at 102–104 degrees and the exhaust pressure at 0.0029–0.0031 Mpa.
Reply #52009-02-15
It seems there’s an issue with your control, and it has little to do with the nozzle.
Reply #62009-02-15
High steam consumption is related to the structure of the deaeration head, the initial oxygen concentration and the desired oxygen concentration, as well as the operating conditions! :lol
Reply #72009-02-15
Take a look to see if it’s useful. There’s also some information on the recovery of deaerator waste steam, but it’s too large to upload (I don’t know how to split it into smaller parts for uploading, sorry). If you need it, please get in touch with me. http://bbs.hcbbs.com/viewthread.php?tid=390102&extra=page%3D1&frombbs=1 This post was last edited by Take a look on 2009-2-15 10:33]
Reply #82009-02-16
What size are your devices? 3 t/h isn’t much, and besides, is the effect of replacing the deaeration head significant? It is better to recycle the waste steam.
Reply #92009-02-16
You should probably contact the manufacturer for specifics

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.