Thread Content
Elemental analysis is required. It is an important method for determining the structure of compounds, as it can provide information such as the elemental composition of the compound and the number of crystal waters. Elemental analysis is a necessary and useful complement to the four major spectroscopic analysis methods—infrared, ultraviolet, nuclear magnetic resonance, and mass spectrometry—it is a test that must be carried out in the study of drug structures. Since the experiment was not conducted by taking into account the structural characteristics of the compounds, and merely served as a routine task, incorrect conclusions were drawn. Below, common issues in elemental analysis are analyzed through some specific examples, in the hope of drawing everyone’s attention to them. 1. Ignoring the crystalline water/adsorbed water in the structure: Certain compounds contain a certain amount of crystalline water in their structure, and many compounds may also have a small amount of adsorbed water. When performing elemental analysis on compounds, it is necessary to consider the influence of crystalline water/adsorbed water on the results; otherwise, incorrect conclusions are likely to be drawn. 1.1 Effects of changes in crystalline water: When performing elemental analysis on compounds that contain crystalline water, two types of errors are commonly encountered: (1) The sample is recrystallized before testing, but the solvent used for recrystallization is different from that used in the synthesis process, resulting in the loss of crystalline water. If a compound’s structure contains 2 molecules of crystal water, and recrystallization during the synthesis is carried out using isopropanol-water, but the compound is recrystallized using acetone before its structure is confirmed, this results in a change in the number of molecule of crystal water in the compound’s structure. (2) Loss of crystal water occurs during drying to remove adsorbed water. To eliminate the interference of adsorbed water on elemental analysis, the test samples are often dried before analysis; however, if the compound structure also contains crystalline water, attention must be paid to the suitability of the drying method. For the drying of such compounds, milder methods such as vacuum drying at 60°C are advisable; vacuum drying at 105°C or drying using infrared lamps should be avoided, as this can easily lead to the loss of crystal water. 1.2 Interference from adsorbed water: Some compounds have a high degree of hygroscopicity, and they tend to absorb moisture during storage or testing. If the samples are not treated before elemental analysis, this may result in an elevated level of hydrogen and a reduced level of carbon and nitrogen. When testing such compounds, the samples should be dried, and it is advisable to avoid conducting tests on days with high humidity, such as rainy days. 2. Ignoring the effect of residual solvents: The organic solvents remaining in the sample, due to their small amounts, generally do not affect the results of elemental analysis. However, sometimes certain organic solvents can form solvates with the sample, creating relatively strong bonds. For example, an aluminum-containing compound can form a stable solvate with the recrystallization solvent when recrystallized using an alcoholic solvent. During elemental analysis, the influence of residual solvents causes a significant deviation between the test results and the theoretical values. Upon supplementation, the applicant conducted further research on the crystallization solvent and used a non-alcoholic solvent for recrystallizing the sample, thereby eliminating the interference from the solvent. 3. There are too few elements tested, so it is not possible to fully reflect the structure. The types of elements present in a sample are important for determining its structure; however, conventional element analyzers can only analyze carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen. To analyze elements such as fluorine, chlorine, sulfur, phosphorus, and metals, other chemical methods must be used. Some applicants, when submitting applications for compounds containing the aforementioned elements, only test for carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen, without analyzing other elements; this fails to provide a complete picture of the compound’s molecular information. Further testing and analysis of these elements are necessary to fully understand the structure of the compound. 4. Problems when using high-resolution mass spectrometry in place of elemental analysis: High-resolution mass spectrometry involves the use of spectrometers with a resolution (M/△M) of over 10,000 to conduct precise analysis of molecular ion peaks, and by combining this with standard spectrum databases, the molecular composition of compounds can be determined. Compared to elemental analysis, high-resolution mass spectrometry offers higher sensitivity and accuracy, as well as being faster and more convenient; the presence of small amounts of impurities in the sample does not affect the results. Therefore, in many cases, elemental analysis can be replaced by high-resolution mass spectrometry. However, in the following two cases, caution should be exercised when using high-resolution mass spectrometry instead of elemental analysis: (1) the molecular ion peak cannot be obtained in the mass spectrum, or the molecular ion peak is very weak. Molecular ions of molecules such as branched alkanes and alcohols are unstable, and thus molecular ion peaks often do not appear ； Alcohols tend to lose water, resulting in a fragment peak at (M-18)+, which can easily lead to the mistaken identification of the fragment ion peak as the molecular ion peak. At this point, it is necessary to reduce the electron impact energy of the mass spectrometer, or to use a soft ionization method to obtain the molecular ion peak. (2) High-resolution mass spectrometry cannot fully reflect the structure of compounds. For some compounds, it is possible to form either monohydrochlorides or dihydrochlorides; an important task in structural confirmation is to determine the number of acid groups in the molecule. Since only the peak of the free base appears in high-resolution mass spectrometry, it is not appropriate to use high-resolution mass spectrometry as a substitute for elemental analysis at this stage; otherwise, it will hinder the acquisition of comprehensive information about the compound. This article is reproduced from Nobel Academic Resources Network http://bbs.ok6ok.com. ☆ Literature sharing, academic exchanges, and academic resources. This post was last edited by Canghai Yili Sha on 2009-2-12 08:46