HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Summary discussion of the two true/false questions from yesterday

2009-02-18View Original

Thread Content

1. In the GB150-1998 standard, the calculation formula for the internal pressure of a cylinder at the design temperature, δ=PDi/2tφ-P, is applicable to the design of steel pressure vessels with a design pressure not exceeding 35 MPa. ( ) 2. During pressure testing, the membrane stress in the cylinder of a pressure vessel shall not exceed 90% of the material’s yield strength σs (σ0.2) at the test temperature. ( ) These two questions were used as exam items, and most people probably got the answers right. However, as for exactly where the error lies, the answers in the replies aren’t complete for everyone. I’ll give a brief summary first, and I hope everyone can provide additional information to arrive at the final answer. 1. 1) P is the design pressure, whereas the formula should be for calculating Pc, the pressure. 2) There is another condition regarding the scope of the formula: Pc≤0.4tφ. 3) As for the minimum pressure being no less than 0.1MPa, this falls outside the scope of GB150. Personally, I don’t think it’s a wrong reason to not do W. 2. 1). For this question, the first reason most people mention is that the pneumatic test should be at 80%. 2) As for the suggestion to multiply by a weld coefficient. I’m not sure about that either. If we add this item to separate air pressure from hydraulic pressure. Is it correct? I would appreciate it if you could share your views further.
Reply #22009-02-18
1. In fact, the premise of this formula is thin-walled containers; therefore, it is inappropriate to use the scope of application specified in GB150 as a basis for judgment. 2. There should originally be a welding joint coefficient included.
Reply #32009-02-18
GB150 clearly states that a welding coefficient should be specified; I’m curious to hear what other opinions the original poster has.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.