What are the key points in reviewing chemical engineering equipment drawings?

This cannot be explained in just a couple of sentences. Each professional design institute has detailed regulations regarding the verification, review, and approval of equipment drawings; these regulations are part of the institute’s standards, and each institute focuses on different aspects； Verification is primarily responsible for general errors such as those in the graphical representations; review is responsible for principle-related errors such as the selection of equipment and materials, design parameters, and design conclusions; whereas approval involves the determination and re-examination of major issues related to the equipment.

We are a manufacturing factory, and it is a prerequisite that the drawings must meet the requirements of relevant laws, regulations, and standards: (1) the legality of the drawings, including whether there is a design qualification stamp for the type of container and whether designers at all levels have signed them; (2) the accuracy and validity of the standards used; (3) the correctness of the classification of the container type. (4) Are the design parameters determined? (5) Manufacturing and acceptance standards. (6) Feasibility of manufacturing by our company (7) Whether the structure and materials used comply with relevant regulations. (8) Accuracy of the flaw detection ratio and acceptable grade. (9) Appropriateness of the selected safety accessories (10) Pressure test requirements (11) Heat treatment requirements (12) Surface and packaging/transportation requirements