Thread Content
Credit can be given for the reboiler temperature pinch, if light materials do not reach the column bottom. Credit can also be given for the sensible heat absorption of the product when the feed enters the column below its bubble point at the relieving pressure. The original text discusses how to take into account the discharge volume of the distillation tower’s safety valve; I’m really not sure how to translate \"credit\" in this context This post was last edited by liming730 on 2009-2-24 08:47.]
Could you explain the context? Are you using safety analysis software like LOPA? In process safety, “credit” is often used to denote utility. For example, if a safety valve is not designed properly, even when installed on a distillation tower, it cannot be considered effective; credit can only be given if the conditions specified in …… (your original wording) are met, in which case the safety valve can serve as an effective protective layer.
Where can I find literature related to process safety valves, process safety, and credits? I want to take a look! You might be right; it’s impossible to be sure!
Should it be translated as “evaluation, prediction”? If there are no light components at the bottom of the tower, it is expected that the temperature of the reboiler can be reduced.
Take a look at this link: http://bbs.hcbbs.com/viewthread.php?tid=338180&highlight=credit
It’s more or less there; it can be understood as “it can be considered (trustworthy, desirable)””