HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

The difference between DCC and CPP processes

2009-02-26View Original

Thread Content

① Catalytic cracking process (DCC process). This process was developed by the Sinopec Petrochemical Research Institute. It uses heavy oil as raw material, uses a solid acid shape-selective molecular sieve catalyst, and performs cracking reactions under mild reaction conditions to produce low-carbon olefins or isomeric olefins and high-octane gasoline. This process draws on fluidized catalytic cracking technology, adopts catalyst fluidization, continuous reaction and regeneration technology, and has achieved industrialization. The DCC process has two operating modes - DCC-I and DCC-II. DCC-Ⅰ adopts relatively harsh operating conditions and reacts in a riser dense-phase fluidized bed reactor to produce gaseous olefins mainly propylene in maximum quantities. ; DCC-Ⅱ adopts milder operating conditions and reacts in a riser reactor to produce the largest amount of small molecular olefins such as propylene, isobutylene and isopentene, and at the same time produce high-octane high-quality gasoline. ② Catalytic thermal cracking process (CPP process). This process is a patented technology for producing ethylene and propylene developed by Sinopec Petrochemical Research Institute. Based on traditional catalytic cracking technology, it uses heavy oils such as wax oil, wax oil mixed with residual oil, or atmospheric residual oil as raw materials. It uses a riser reactor and a specially developed catalyst and a continuous reaction-regeneration cycle operation mode of fluidized transportation of the catalyst to produce ethylene and propylene under operating conditions that are gentler than steam cracking. The CPP process is developed on the basis of the catalytic cracking DCC process. Its key technology is to convert its target product from propylene into ethylene and propylene through further improvement of the process and catalyst.
Reply #22009-02-26
:victory: Haha, come on
Reply #32009-02-26
May I ask which process is more commonly used now?

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.