Thread Content
What is the ratio of radius to height of a chemical tower pressure vessel? Is H=0.5~1.5R feasible?
Steel vessel, height>10m, H/D>5 (D is the average diameter) skirt self-supporting, design pressure
It's rare to see such a small height-to-diameter ratio. This one doesn't look like a tower.
If we make a storage irrigation tank with a diameter of 12 meters and a cylinder height of 4 meters, how can we determine the cone height of the upper head? Is it okay to use H=0.5~1.5R? For example, if H=0.8R, H=4.8 meters, then the height of the upper head is 0.8 meters. Some storage irrigation is intended to be used for yellow phosphorus storage irrigation. Does this meet the design standards?
Why not use a vault? This 12-meter storage tank can be designed directly according to the storage tank standards. There is no need to clamp any containers. Using a vault is safe and economical, and it is also not high. It is also very convenient to set up ladders or top guardrails. Use a tapered top. Generally speaking, the taper is about 12 degrees. You can convert it.
If it is made into a vault, is it more difficult to make the top than a cone? Can you draw a picture and label it for me?
There should be no such ratio. Our company has a tower with a diameter of only 400 meters and a height of about 30 meters.
When the radius and height of a chemical tower pressure vessel are within a certain ratio, it is a standard vessel, but its design is often limited by local conditions, such as: Space limitations. This may require designing a non-standard container, which is also allowed in the specification.