Is such a leader a good leader?
Thread Content
Our company’s boss also made it step by step, but he had better opportunities than others. After becoming the boss, several things showed that his competence wasn’t that great: first, he constantly criticized his predecessors and also liked to scold his subordinates; second, he wouldn’t give employees raises when the company was doing well, but would cut their salaries by a large margin during financial crises. Third, the people working under the company don’t understand what the company is doing.
If what you say is true, then he indeed isn’t a good leader
This one. . . Different people have different opinions; it’s up to each individual. But you do have a chance
Although your leaders rose to their positions step by step, if it’s really as the original poster says, then he is indeed not very good!
How can such a leader be considered a good leader?
One can’t be lucky all the time. He made progress step by step; if every step relied on luck, then he would be an invincibly lucky person
Sometimes people rely not only on their abilities but also on what they say
Eh! Once people reach a certain height, they lose their sense of propriety!
Those who constantly talk back to others, treat their employees poorly, and fail to see the future of the company are not fit to be leaders, let alone good ones! ! !
A good leader is not one who rises through the ranks step by step; such progress does not indicate strong capabilities or high management skills. Of course, one cannot rely solely on luck – it’s more likely that having a good relationship with the leader and being close to them plays a role. As long as one doesn’t make mistakes at work and gains the leader’s approval, it’s possible to advance quickly. Subordinates, on the other hand, do not have any decision-making power. But if his subordinates ever rise above him, then his good days will be over. Don’t you see that many corrupt officials and **elements don’t necessarily have great abilities, yet they enjoy great success in their official careers? This kind of situation is very common in China; on the contrary, it’s much better in foreign companies. But it's better to be low-key in life.
It’s better to be low-key in life; don’t waste energy gossiping about others behind their backs.
Is a good leader like him? It shouldn’t count, I guess
Not necessarily; such a leader might hold a grudge against the predecessor. Not good to subordinates? State-owned enterprises, I guess. Scolding subordinates? State-owned or private enterprise? State-owned enterprises are normal. That person in the private company is simply not competent. A pay cut? Great. For the company, it reduces fixed costs. That is the profit. His leadership is highly appreciated. In summary, your leader is a leader who knows how to be an official. Apart from a small flaw. Cursing the ex. You should get along better with him; who knows, you might get promoted too in the future. Watch. Definitely. Young people upstairs, please don’t mislead the original poster; try to understand this society.
I don’t think he can be considered a good leader; there are too few good leaders these days!
As the saying goes: Eat meat with wolves, and...
All crows in the world are black; don’t let this affect your mood
Leaders are generally like this; don’t have too many illusions. As the saying goes, tigers in the east kill people, and tigers in the west also kill people – it’s the same everywhere. If you become a leader yourself, you might behave in the same way, haha~~~~
Times create heroes, right? There are still many such leaders in China! We’re not at that level, so we can’t understand the responsibilities at that level!