Questions about rewards for replies

As long as you actively participate in the discussion, other friends will give you positive ratings. This is the best reward for your reply to the discussion!

Only posts you post that are responded to should be rated as a thank you: handshake

Everyone has been working hard, and many comrades are still willing to rate: lol

In technical discussion forums, should there be a lower limit for the ratings of participants who "actively participate", "discuss in depth", and "help others solve problems"? The moderators’ ratings of 3 wealth and 4 wealth are very unpleasant!

This is an encouragement to Sichuan friends:)

This is my understanding of this question: 1. First of all, rating is a subjective judgment, which is related to many factors. For example, personal preference, personal understanding of the content of the reply. As well as the rating formed by the posters on the board.* Some boards give more points, and some boards give less points. There is indeed this unpleasant 2. The three levels of "active participation", "in-depth discussion" and "helping others solve problems" should be different. To put it simply, "active participation" I understand is a kind of encouragement, "in-depth discussion" is a kind of recognition, and the published content has reached a certain depth; "helping others solve problems" is a reward. I'm not good at judging what the scores for each level should be, but each version has its own situation. I believe that a newbie like me should learn from the elders. * . 3. Regarding the small number of ratings, my basic principle is to give less times and more points, and add 4 or 5 points at a time. To encourage "active participation", even less than 5 points may be less per time, but I think as long as the ratings are timely and accurate and have the effect of encouraging speeches, basically any post will be given a certain degree of bonus points as long as it is not meaningless or irritating. This is actually better than 10 points at once. More participation and more communication are the most important goals. The key is what kind of method is used. 4. You can still see some old posts with very strong ratings, adding several charms and dozens of points. The explanation is that the forum was less popular in the early stage and the points were added fiercely. So what now? Haichuan has grown in size, and it seems that Buzhu has become stingy? I don’t think so, because the number of points added is also related to the value of the wealth. I think we should try to control the size of uploaded attachments at the same time. If you can upload large attachments, try to make them as large as possible. Bamboo can also regularly organize posts. The original 2 or 30 attachments have been recompressed and reduced to less than 10. It is also a good way to save everyone's wealth. Simply put, money must be truly valuable. 5. The issue of rewards covers a wide range, and it is difficult to determine it with certain rules. So I think there is no need to stipulate anything, as it will not reflect flexibility if it is too rigid. Each edition has its own style, everyone has his own situation, and each post has its own characteristics. And I have very little experience. I think Buzhu can take more time to browse other forums. At least familiarize himself with the forums in his own discussion area. Regarding the issue of grading, it is absolutely not advisable to impose rigid rules from top to bottom. However, a culture and atmosphere can be formed from the bottom up. * I can learn from it. My personal opinion. It does not represent the layout. Corrections and guidance are welcome.

Although my academic qualifications are not high, I really need more points for what the poster said, but I very much agree with the statement of yutr, the moderator on the 7th floor. Moreover, since I entered Haichuan, I feel that friends in Haichuan are still very active. Most of them can actively participate in discussions and give ratings. As for the level of ratings, I think this is not a problem. As long as the ratings are given, it means that the readers of the posts recognize the posts and the people who reply. I have also visited and studied at four other chemical industry forums * , and found that the popularity was very poor, and it was impossible to compete with Haichuan. I would like to sincerely thank Haichuan Boss for his management and motivating system that have built up the popularity!

The reason why Haichuan can attract so many members shows that Haichuan has its own characteristics and we must continue to maintain it.

Support the development of Haichuan and hope it gets better and better!

“"Sister" is telling the truth. Some moderators give very few ratings to technical exchange posts. Regardless of whether the reply is correct, whether the answer is detailed, or the level of the reply, they will always give a 3-point rating. Personally, I feel that it dampens the enthusiasm of members. Isn't technology valuable? Is this also true in virtual cyberspace? Firmly oppose this approach! This post was last edited by huamei461112 on 2009-3-3 20:30 ]

The bonus points in the leisure area are controlled below 5 wealth. By inference, should there be more posts worth scoring in the technical exchange area than 5 wealth? Does the rating of 3 wealth give some new members a hint - posting a topic can get 1 wealth, and it is possible to get a rating of 3 wealth. I think if the rating is above 5 wealth, people will not have this illusion! Besides, some members' replies are indeed excellent, and they are based on their own experience and thinking. This is very different from uploading attachments - it is a real personal contribution.