Thread Content
Should the devices that are obscured in the sectional 3D view of the equipment layout diagram still be drawn? Is there any standard description for this situation?〉
It’s best to draw it, as this provides a more intuitive understanding of the overall situation!
Equipment layout diagrams are created by combining plan views and sectional views. When a plan view is not sufficient to convey the information clearly, a sectional view should be used. In your case, it’s possible to take sectional views from multiple directions; if one direction isn’t enough, take another. Additionally, if elevation and positioning details aren’t relevant, they can generally be omitted
Personally, I think it’s better to include drawings; equipment diagrams are like verbal descriptions, meant to make things clear. As for what standards are required, it’s hard to say
It’s not necessary to draw. Where the front view cannot convey things clearly, cross-sections should be drawn.
It’s not necessary to draw; if the expression isn’t clear, draw detailed partial views.
Drawings are used to convey our design concepts – accurately and clearly. If the layout plan isn’t clear enough, then detailed sectional drawings are created.
Secondary occlusions are ignored. When shading once, it is necessary to draw the approximate dimensions of large equipment using continuous short lines. If the details or small components are not visible when printing. It can be canceled temporarily.