Thread Content
Serial Number Abbreviation Description Patent Holder 1 MGG Uses paraffin wax-treated residue as feedstock to produce maximum amounts of gasoline and liquefied gas RIPP 2 ARGG Uses atmospheric residue as feedstock to produce maximum amounts of gasoline and liquefied gas RIPP 3 MIO Produces maximum amounts of isoparaffins RIPP 4 MGD Produces large quantities of liquefied gas and light diesel RIPP 5 MIP Produces large amounts of isooctanes/gasoline olefins RIPP 6 CPP Process for producing ethylene via thermal cracking RIPP 7 DNCC Processes coker wax residue through adsorption conversion RIPP 8 DOCR Increases the octane rating of gasoline made from paraffinic feedstocks RIPP 9 FDFCC Flexible multi-effect catalytic cracking to produce large amounts of light olefins/gasoline olefins LPEC 10 HCC Produces ethylene from heavy oil via contact process LPEC 11 TSRFCC Two-stage riser system to increase the yield of light oils Petroleum University 12 Auxiliary riser Used for modifying gasoline and reducing olefin content Petroleum University 12 DCC-1 Catalytic cracking to produce maximum amounts of light olefins RIPP DCC-2 Moderate catalytic cracking to produce large amounts of light olefins and petroleum products RIPP
The DOCP was missed; it’s similar to DOCR.
Why are these technologies referred to as the catalytic cracking family of technologies? How did the term \"catalytic cracking family\" come about?
Is MDP technology included?
There are others as well; FCC technology has many extensions.
Among the various catalytic cracking family technologies, can DCC technology be considered a high-level one that is recognized by international peers?