Thread Content
Labor discipline and rewards/punishments: Labor discipline refers to the set of rules governing employees’ work behavior that are established by enterprises in accordance with relevant regulations. It represents the rules and order that employees must follow during their work, and it serves as a guide to ensure that employees complete their assigned tasks within the specified time frames, with the required quality, using the appropriate procedures and methods. China’s Labor Law stipulates that: “Workers shall complete their work tasks, improve their professional skills, abide by labor safety and health regulations, and observe labor discipline and professional ethics.” The quality of labor discipline in a company reflects the work attitude of its employees and the degree of cooperation among them. I. Methods of disciplinary action: When punishing employees, it is necessary not only to strictly abide by the relevant laws and regulations, but also to pay attention to the methods of handling such situations. If disciplinary actions are used improperly, they can have harmful effects on both employees and the organization. On the other hand, fair and reasonable disciplinary actions have various positive functions: (1) integration function. Disciplinary actions can ensure that employees’ behavior is in line with the company’s rules and regulations, promote cooperation among employees, enhance the company’s cohesion, and help it achieve its goals more effectively. (2) Correction function. Fair and reasonable disciplinary actions enable the employee who is disciplined to recognize their mistakes or shortcomings, to more consciously regulate their behavior, improve their working methods, and enhance work efficiency. (3) Incentive function. Punishing employees who perform poorly or violate rules and laws is, to some extent, a reward for those good employees who abide by the law, work hard, and are responsible. On the contrary, if discipline is lax in a company and there are no constraints on poor behavior, it will demotivate hardworking employees. For disciplinary actions to be fair, an important prerequisite is to follow a reasonable decision-making procedure for such actions. Generally, the decision-making process for disciplinary actions includes the following steps: (1) defining organizational goals and establishing corporate rules and regulations that help achieve those goals ； (2) Explain the specific details of the rules and regulations to employees, so that they clearly understand what behaviors will be punished and how such punishments will be imposed ； (3) Observe employees’ performance and compare it with the rules and regulations; when it is found that an employee’s behavior deviates from the company’s rules, considering imposing disciplinary action is appropriate. It should be noted here that the evaluation of employees’ performance must be based on the company’s rules and regulations, rather than on the personal preferences of the company’s leaders. Leaders may disapprove of the behavior of some employees, but as long as it does not violate the company’s rules and regulations, no action should be taken against them ； (4) Impose appropriate disciplinary actions and reiterate the company’s rules and regulations to the employees. When making decisions regarding disciplinary actions, relevant rules must be strictly followed; more severe disciplinary actions should be decided after a meeting for discussion. In Western companies, the three common forms of disciplinary action are as follows: (1) the furnace method. In this way, imposing a penalty is like asking someone to touch a hot stove. This approach has three characteristics. The first is timeliness: imposing sanctions immediately when employees exhibit deviant behavior, so that they understand the reasons for such sanctions ； The second is precautionary nature, that is, giving warnings in advance about behaviors that are unacceptable, just as the heat from a stove serves as a reminder to people not to touch it ； Third is consistency, that is, treating matters rather than individuals; no matter who it is, if they make the same mistake, they shall receive the same punishment, just as a hot stove causes the same degree of burn to anyone who touches it. The disciplinary measures based on the hot stove method are simple and straightforward to implement, but they also have certain limitations. For example, when it comes to two employees who have made the same mistake, if one has been working for 20 years with excellent performance while the other has just started working and has average performance, imposing the same penalty on them may seem unfair to some people. (2) Progressive. In this way, when deciding what kind of sanction to impose, the principle of progressing from mild to severe penalties should be followed to ensure that the lightest punishment is applied for the committed error. First, consider whether a penalty should be imposed; if so, then determine whether an oral warning is sufficient. If the answer is “no”, then consider a written warning, and so on. (3) Disciplinary action without punishment. This approach emphasizes employees' self-awareness and reflective mindset. The specific approach is that if an employee who has previously violated the rules and regulations continues to break them after receiving verbal and written warnings, they are given paid leave to spend a few days away from their job to reflect on whether they are willing to abide by the rules and regulations and to continue working at the company. He was then asked to reach an agreement with the company to ensure that he would not make the same mistake again, otherwise he would have to resign automatically. It should be noted that this method of disciplinary action is practiced by some Western companies and differs from China’s current regulations. II. Implementation of Disciplinary Actions Once a decision is made to impose disciplinary action on an employee, the key lies in how to carry it out. At this time, the following points should be noted: (1) It is necessary to overcome the practical and psychological barriers associated with imposing disciplinary actions. Many supervisors are reluctant to discipline their subordinates, feeling that doing so is a very difficult task. The reason may lie in the supervisor having a dual barrier to imposing sanctions. First is the capability gap — many supervisors have not received training on how to impose disciplinary actions and lack the relevant knowledge and skills. The second is a psychological barrier – managers have many concerns regarding disciplining their subordinates: they are afraid of ruining the relationship and losing the friendship with them ； Afraid that others will not support one’s decision to impose a penalty ； Those afraid of being punished look for an opportunity to take revenge later ； Fearing that imposing sanctions will require too much time and effort, etc. To address these issues, it can start with providing relevant training for managers; once they acquire the necessary management knowledge and interpersonal communication skills, their psychological concerns will also be alleviated. (II) When imposing disciplinary actions, it is necessary to choose the appropriate time and place. On one hand, try not to criticize an employee in front of other colleagues. Doing so will make the person being criticized feel embarrassed in front of their colleagues, triggering strong negative emotions and making it difficult to achieve good results. On the other hand, try to wait until the employee is calm before giving criticism. Some employees may experience strong emotional reactions after making mistakes, and if criticism is given at the wrong time, it can have the opposite effect. (III) The enforcement of disciplinary actions should be consistent to avoid being lenient at times and strict at other times; some supervisors are too lenient at the beginning of the disciplinary process but then become too strict. This makes it difficult for employees to understand what the penalty corresponding to a certain deviation is. The reason for the pattern of being lenient at first and then strict is that some supervisors do not make decisions regarding disciplinary actions in accordance with the disciplinary regulations; instead, they take their own tolerance levels into account. When there are few instances of misbehavior, they may ignore it, but when an employee repeats the same mistakes or when many employees commit similar errors, they react as if faced with a serious problem and impose very severe penalties. To resolve this issue, supervisors must adhere to the company’s rules and regulations as the standard for deciding whether to impose a penalty or what kind of penalty to apply, while trying to minimize the influence of personal subjective factors. (IV) Adopt standardized disciplinary procedures: The disciplinary process itself needs to be managed in a standardized manner, with defined work steps and requirements, in order to avoid the influence of subjectivity and arbitrariness. Some human resources management experts suggest that the following disciplinary procedures can be adopted: (1) A manual outlining the company’s disciplinary procedures should be prepared and distributed to all employees. The procedure should clearly list the types of sanctions and their applicable scope, as well as the methods for implementing them. (2) Employees should be told what mistakes they have made, and they should be allowed to appeal. (3) A thorough investigation must be conducted before deciding on a penalty. Some more severe disciplinary actions, such as dismissing employees, must be approved by the relevant management department. (4) When imposing disciplinary action, a reasonable explanation must be provided, and employees must be assured of the right to appeal through specific procedures. (5) Except for immediate dismissal, when a disciplinary action is necessary, the supervisor shall give a formal verbal warning to those who have committed minor violations, and a written warning to those who have committed serious violations.