Everyone, discuss the DCS software simulation features of various manufacturers

Thread Content

Let’s discuss the DCS simulation capabilities of various manufacturers. 1. For Hollyland’s SMARTPRO, the upper-level software CITECT requires the use of disk devices, or OPC or MODBUS simulators, in order to simulate the dynamic elements or digital displays on the screen. The lower-level CONMAKER originally has simulation capabilities; if image display is required, it can be done in the views within the software. The lower level of MACSV is also CODESYS, and simulation is possible as well; however, in my opinion, the simulation seems to have little connection with the upper level. If CODESYS can be improved to send data outward during simulation, communication between the upper and lower levels will be seamless. (This can be achieved through virtual serial ports, etc.; it’s my personal suggestion.) 2. The simulation function of the Shanghai Xinhua ONXDC system is the best among so many DCS systems – it allows for the creation of virtual main controllers, provides real-time display of the relevant visuals, and also supports virtual networking; communication between upper-level and lower-level components is efficient. The only downside is that its upper-level configuration capabilities are somewhat inferior to those of other systems. 3. Zhejiang University Zhongkong JX-300XP (? ) 4. HONEYWELL TPS (? ) 5. DEVLTA, (?) ) 6. CS3000 (? ) 7、PCS7 8、Eurotech T2550 9、ABB 800F 10、. . . . . Please add more details. This post was last edited by hai*nli on 2009-3-5 at 11:50.]