Reading judgment about wrong and not mentioned
Thread Content
It is easy to confuse people with wrong and not mentioned in reading judgment! I often understand the meaning of the article and the topic, but make a mistake when judging whether it is wrong or not mentioned:'( ——————————————————————Example dividing line———————————————————————————————— Take the 09 Professional Title English Tutorial Textbook, Reading Judgment Part 2, Question 3 as an example: The question is judgment: “Columbia University is the first to use this method,” the article states: “Others have also used this method." Answers and solutions think: “The article doesn’t mention who was the first to use this method, so I should select not mentioned.” I think: “Since the article has mentioned that other people have used this method, then Columbia University is not the first to use this method, so I should choose wrong.”
Regarding the author’s judgment that “Columbia University is not the first to use this method”, I think so.: The article did not mention that Columbia University was the first to use this method, but it also did not say that Columbia University was not the first to use this method. Both are possible, so you can't just answer a question that contains one possible answer.
The test instructions explain 1. When the subject range of the sentence in the question is larger than the subject range of the original sentence, we can judge that the sentence is wrong. 2. When the content mentioned in the topic sentence is not mentioned at all in the article, and the subject range of the huoz title sentence is smaller than the subject range of the original sentence, the topic can be judged as not mentioned. You can refer to this explanation when making a judgment.
Thank you, the two answers above are very enlightening: handshake
This is called an uncertainty multiple choice question. Only choose the closest answer. “. . . Since the article has already mentioned that other people have used this method,. . . ”The "others" you mentioned may have taught at Columbia University before, or went to Columbia University after using this method, right? or possibility: Columbia was the first to use it. After that, professors from other universities "also" began to use this method. Once it is denied, any possibility associated with it would not exist. Since there is the possibility of some events, you can't kill it with one stick!