HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Too many questions regarding pipeline flange standards

2009-03-12View Original

Thread Content

As is well known, there are numerous standards for pipeline flanges in **, such as GB, HG, JB, SY, SH, etc.; if dealing with external transactions, other standards may also be required. Why are there so many standards for pipeline flanges in our country? Why don’t **standardization committees establish a unified standard? After so many years of practical use, it’s entirely possible to standardize all these standards – that would reduce the amount of work by so much! To be honest, standardizing management across various industries is quite challenging as well. Everyone is welcome to join the discussion and share their opinions.
Reply #22009-03-12
The situation you describe does indeed exist; it is the result of various industry ministries developing independently during the planned economy era, **with no timely standardization across the entire engineering sector. Standardization is necessary, but each industry standard has its own theoretical basis and calculation methods; standardization requires to be carried out at a higher level by an organization capable of managing various industries. I think the Chinese Academy of Engineering is capable of doing this.
Reply #32009-03-12
I’m not sure if it’s the same abroad; besides ASME B16, are there any other standards in the United States?
Reply #42009-03-12
Yes, we often encounter problems with this issue. As those who work on the internal components, we frequently have to connect them to the flanges of the tower’s piping. The different standards for selecting flanges for these piping connections require that our matching components also comply with those standards, as does the choice of bolts used. Since the quantities required are small, purchasing them becomes quite troublesome. It would be much easier if there were a unified standard.
Reply #52009-03-12
The same is true abroad; it’s relatively fewer; For example: ANSI, ISO, JIS, DIN – they simply don’t have as many standards as we do
Reply #62009-03-12
The general trend is toward unity, but the original poster shouldn’t be too hasty.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.