Regarding the manufacturing of equipment with mixing functions
Thread Content
Let’s discuss what considerations should be taken into account when manufacturing container equipment with agitators :handshake
Same question. For example, consider two storage tanks at atmospheric pressure: one with agitation and the other without. What special considerations are required when designing the tank with agitation compared to the one without it? Should alternating loads and fatigue be taken into consideration?
This is a relatively complex issue that requires analysis on a case-by-case basis. Mixing equipment used in continuous operation does not need to take fatigue into consideration, whereas equipment operated intermittently must have its number of cyclic alternating loads evaluated in accordance with JB4732; if this number exceeds 1000, analytical design is necessary； Otherwise, follow the conventional design. Furthermore, for mixing equipment, the corrosion margin should also take into account the effect of abrasion. The stiffness factor should also be taken into account in its head design; that’s all I know.
I have done course design projects; I can’t remember anything special to pay attention to – just make sure to calculate the stirring shaft properly and verify it, and that’s it
What the two people upstairs are saying is that the flow of material inside the mixing tank does not have any effect on the tank’s strength other than the static pressure?
The container itself is generally designed without a stirrer, taking into account the necessary amount of wear. If the stirring torque is too high, consider a design that separates the reducer from the tank.