HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Issues with the connection methods between the tube sheet, the cylinder, and the tube box.

2009-03-13View Original

Thread Content

The connection method for fixed-tube-sheet heat exchangers – the calculations in 151 apply to types b and c without flanges, or to type e with flanges on the extended sections. However, in our actual design, we use a connection method similar to type A, but the extended portion of the tube sheet is equipped with flanges. Is such a structure reasonable? If flanges are not used and the heat exchanger is horizontal, the weight of its structure itself may cause deformation. But with flanges, it becomes a problem in terms of calculation. We used SW6 based on type E before; is such a result correct?
Reply #22009-03-13
Personal opinions can be calculated as type A. The type E is conservative in nature, as the tube sheet does not truly serve as a flange.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.