The troubles of real moderators – Should they use their own wealth to download their own content? How should moderation services be priced?
Thread Content
I have two experiences to share with you. 1. I often compare the content of new posts and old posts. To avoid wronging honest people and to prevent spamming, I would frequently download similar posts for comparison, thinking that it wouldn’t result in any penalty (I was young and impulsive). Be careful on certain forums! By chance, I discovered that such actions did lead to penalties, so I stopped comparing and sharing content. It felt a bit uncomfortable. 2. Just now I posted a sample post about product selection; I suddenly forgot whether it should be in Chinese or English, so I checked online. Well, there was still a penalty. Fine, let it be. But is this reasonable? Is there any better way to handle this?
Yes, I feel the same way; I often need to edit other people’s posts, but it usually results in points being deducted. I suggest that downloading content in the forums that I manage should not result in any point deductions.
This issue has been discussed before. The answer is: 1. Moderators are paid. 2. Moderators can earn bonuses through their own efforts. 3. If wealth is needed, it can be obtained from the super-editor in one’s district or directly from the cleaners. This post was last edited by Shuichangshou on 2009-3-13 22:57.]
For moderators who need to download large amounts of data frequently. Funding can be applied for from this district’s super-editing fund. If it’s downloaded occasionally, it won’t cost much either. Just have the extra edition cover it for me when the bonus is paid out each month.
The process for downloading attachments is the same for moderators and regular members.
This is what moderators do; they receive a salary and bonuses every month.
It’s clear now, thank you all. There’s no need for special privileges; the remaining issue is that regular members need to be careful when doing similar things, just to avoid affecting their emotions.
I took a look; if we were to spend our moderator salaries seriously, it would only be enough to cover two days. Last time, if it hadn’t been for a friend who gave my post extra points, we would have been penniless last week and had to earn money by working. It should be set so that there are no wealth downloads in the jurisdiction. I’m poor again now; I really don’t know what to do! Support the original poster’s initiative!
Hehe, your wealth is indeed rather poor. My secret is to never give in to the temptation to change my charm; I just stay as old as I am. Money isn’t a problem, hahaha. I’m four years old now, haha. Sometimes I think that since this is just a hobby for me, it doesn’t really matter. Last edited by wopale3 on 2009-3-15 09:52.]
Am I about to exchange charm for points? I changed the charm earlier, wasn’t it just for reading permissions! I won’t change it now either. Today, my focus at work shifted to the chemical analysis section, which falls within my area of responsibility, and I noticed a problem: is it really not necessary for moderators to review every file that is uploaded? If moderators want to view the uploaded attachments, they need wealth as well. In a forum with a relatively high level of activity, a moderator’s salary would only last for one day at most. Now I’ve noticed that many moderators have plenty of wealth, which means that there’s no need for them to verify such things at all. It seems there’s quite a lot I need to adapt to. This post was last edited by chengjingbao on 2009-3-15 14:59]
Ah, that’s exactly what I’m talking about. When I open it, I still have to pay money, even without downloading anything. There was a time when I was really keen on organizing the files on the forum – there was a lot of repetition. But now I don’t have the time for that, so I’ve given up on it. I support you; I hope this rule won’t dampen your enthusiasm. You can do as the boss suggested and ask him for some coins. After all, there’s performance-based support available
In the field of industrial automation, many books deal with online monitoring and bus control; both of these are related to analysis, and I will look into them later. I’ll go back to my own section and organize it slowly. If you have money, do the work that requires money; if you don’t have money, do the work that doesn’t require it. Nothing will be delayed. Feel free to visit the chemical analysis section from time to time; you’re most welcome!
Oh, okay, let’s be friends. I’ll come by later to take a look. But I think time is the main issue; money is secondary – reason still counts here.
It seems you manage quite a lot; I’m also planning to get started.
You can share your overall impressions of the chemical analysis version as well as your management perspectives – feel free to say whatever is on your mind. Tell us what you hope for and what it should look like; speak more about it! The successes are yours; the mistakes are mine.
Haha, you’re really an enthusiastic moderator. I did take a look, but many of the topics are too technical for me to understand. Analytical instruments are a separate field of study. The moderators who specialize in field instruments must be more knowledgeable than I am. It seems like you all have a lot of work to do – thank you for your hard work! There’s a need for more categorization, as there’s quite a bit of repetitive work involved.