Thread Content
Serial Number, Company Name, Total Installed Capacity in MW, Desulfurization Method Used and Its Percentage: “~; |( w3 \- y4 x’ V 1 Beijing Guodian Longyuan Environmental Protection Engineering Co., Ltd. 14298 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 99.3% H% j, p5 o, Q; k& Q Flue gas circulating fluidized bed 0.7% 2 Wuhan Kaidi Power Environmental Protection Co., Ltd. 13340 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 82.3% Dry method 17.7%8 z) ~+ R+ M: E3 R: o2 F; S 3 Beijing Boqi Power Technology Co., Ltd. 11920 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 100%% U* {4 z3 u’ o$ X9 ` 4 Shandong Sanrong Environmental Protection Engineering Co., Ltd. 10410 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 98%6 a- ^! ]2 q’ I’ ~! }Flue gas circulating fluidized bed 2% 5 Zhejiang Zhejiang University NetNew Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Co., Ltd. 8030 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 100% 6 China Power Investment Yuanda Environmental Protection Engineering Co., Ltd. 7720 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 100%& m& G; u1 O0 m/ i’ r% O. { 7 Jiangsu Suyuan Environmental Protection Engineering Co., Ltd. 7560 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 100% 8 Zhejiang Tiandi Environmental Protection Engineering Co., Ltd. 5805 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 100%# d! 9 China Huadian Engineering (Group) Co., Ltd. 5477 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 100%1 T8 V$ D9 x: X: |# e 10 Beijing Guodian Qingxin Environmental Protection Technology Engineering Co., Ltd. 4340 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 100%) L4 q- C8 n C0 z! G 11 Shanghai Longjing Environmental Protection Technology Engineering Co., Ltd. 4310 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 100%, o0 _! }1 t1 ?’ I- J 12 Datang Environmental Technology Engineering Co., Ltd. 4080 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 100% 13 Guohua Ebara Environmental Engineering Co., Ltd. 4000 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 100% 14 Zhejiang Lan Tian Qi Shi Environmental Protection Group Co., Ltd. 2400 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 100% 15 Zhejiang Feida Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. 2280 Circulating semi-dry method 41.2% Lime-stone gypsum wet method 58.8% 16 Dongfang Boiler (Group) Co., Ltd. 1900 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 84.2%( i0 j4 G. K+ N) j Seawater desulfurization 15.8%) B; C2 Y/ x’ \; z 17 Guangzhou Yueshou Industrial Co., Ltd. 1210 AG-2 Dry method 100%, h2 {4 k: |5 U( V 18 Hunan Yongqing Desulfurization Co., Ltd. 1210 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 100% 19 Hunan Lunan Desulfurization and Dust Removal Equipment Co., Ltd. 985 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 92.6% Sodium-calcium double-alkali method 7.4%9 z6 C* S; r* g* 20 Fujian Longjing Environmental Protection Co., Ltd. 935 Flue gas circulating fluidized bed 100%8 k( a, s6 x u 21 Guodian Environmental Protection Research Institute 880 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 100%. o" V/ Y( d6 S+ J* E8 L 22 Guangdong Electric Power Design and Research Institute 850 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 100% 23 Beijing Langxinming Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. 800 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 100% 24 Shandong Luneng Engineering Co., Ltd. 775 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 80% Flue gas circulating fluidized bed 20%, i; P& Y5 i C% @7 w 25 Guangzhou Tianci Sanhe Environmental Protection Engineering Co., Ltd. 622 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 60% Sodium-calcium double-alkali method 40%! ^( O’ e7 i: E6 O 26 Liaoning Kolin Environmental Protection Engineering Co., Ltd. 325 NID Circulating semi-dry method 92.3% Flue gas circulating fluidized bed 7.7% 27 Shandong Shanda Energy Environment Co., Ltd. 320 Flue gas circulating fluidized bed 100% 28 Guizhou Xingyun Environmental Protection Co., Ltd. 300 Lime-stone gypsum wet method 100% 29 Wuhan Jingyuan Environmental Engineering Co., Ltd. 300 Seawater method 100% 30 Zhenjiang Jiangnan Environmental Protection Engineering Construction Co., Ltd. 177.5 Ammonia fertilizer method 100%
Although it’s a post from over a year ago, I’d like to add that the rankings listed above are based on the capacity of the flue gas desulfurization projects that were in operation by the end of 2006
Ah, so much progress has been made in these past few years; maybe there will be a new ranking.