HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Quantification of sulfur-containing substances in benzene chloride

2009-03-16View Original

Thread Content

Quantification of sulfur-containing substances in benzene chloride
I. Reagents and instruments
Methanol (analytical grade or chromatographic grade)
Thiophene, carbon disulfide, 2,5-dichlorothiophene
GC6890 (with FPD detector equipped with an S-filter and an automatic sampler)
II. Analysis conditions:
Vaporization chamber: 200°C
Detection chamber: 200°C
Auxiliary temperature: 200°C
Column temperature: 60–100°C (programmed temperature rise)
Chromatography column: FFAP
Gas flow rates: Hydrogen: 90 ml/min; Air: 100 ml/min
Split ratio: 20:1 (column flow rate: 2 ml/min)
III. Determination of the minimum detection limits for carbon disulfide, thiophene, and 2,5-dichlorothiophene
1. Preparation of standard solutions
(1) Solution A: Weigh 1.3615 grams of thiophene, 1.017 grams of carbon disulfide, and 1.0148 grams of 2,5-dichlorothiophene respectively, place them in a 100 ml volumetric flask, dilute to the mark with methanol, and mix well for later use. The concentrations are 13.615 mg/ml, 10.17 mg/ml, and 10.148 mg/ml respectively. (2) Solution B: Transfer 1 ml from Solution A into a 100 ml volumetric flask, dilute to the mark with methanol, mix well, and set aside for use. The concentrations are 0.13615 mg/ml, 0.1017 mg/ml, and 0.10148 mg/ml respectively. (3) Solution C: Transfer 1 ml from Solution B into a 100 ml volumetric flask, dilute to the mark with methanol, mix well, and set aside for use. The concentrations are 1.3615 ug/ml, 1.017 ug/ml, and 1.0148 ug/ml respectively. (4) Transfer 1 ml, 2.5 ml, and 5 ml respectively from solution C into 10 ml volumetric flasks numbered 4, 5, and 6, dilute to the mark with methanol, mix well, and set aside for use. The concentrations are as follows: Number, Thiophene (ug/ml), Carbon disulfide (ug/ml), 2,5-Dichlorothiophene (ug/ml): 40.13, 61.50, 101.70, 101.48, 50.34, 040.25, 430.25, 3760.68, 0750.50, 850.50, 47. Solution C: 1.36, 151.01, 71.01, 48. Solution D: 5 ml of Solution B was transferred into a 100 ml volumetric flask and diluted to the mark with methanol; after mixing, it was set aside for use. The concentrations are 6.8075 ug/ml, 5.085 ug/ml, and 5.074 ug/ml respectively. (6) Solution E: Transfer 1 ml from Solution B into a 10 ml volumetric flask, dilute to the mark with methanol, mix well, and set aside for use. The concentrations are 13.615 ug/ml, 10.17 ug/ml, and 10.148 ug/ml respectively. (7) Solution F: Transfer 5 ml from Solution B into a 10 ml volumetric flask, dilute to the mark with methanol, mix well, and set aside for use. The concentrations are 68.075 ug/ml, 50.85 ug/ml, and 50.74 ug/ml respectively. 2. Sampling was carried out when the instrument was stable. The results of sampling are as follows: Sample number, Thiophene (area), Carbon disulfide (area), 2,5-Dichlorothiophene (peak area). Spectrum number: Sample 4 – not detected, not detected, not detected; Sample 20060501001 – not detected, 11.03, not detected; Sample 20060501002 – 16.16, 23.36, 14.59; Sample 20060501003 – Solution C: 61.95, 88.84, 17.47; Sample 20060501004 – Solution D: 732.47, 1491.84, 144.65; Sample 20060501005 – Solution E: 2986.47, 7149.55, 533.63; Sample 20060501006 – Solution F: 8627, 171.79, 3233.51, 2030.7. The detailed spectra are attached separately. (Under these conditions, the lowest detection limit for thiophene is 0.68 ppm, for carbon disulfide it is 0.25 ppm, and for 2,5-dichlorothiophene it is 0.5047 ppm.) IV. Preparation of calibration curves: Standard curves were prepared using the spectra of Sample 3, Solution C, and Solution D. The correlation coefficients obtained were: r for thiophene = 0.9855, r for carbon disulfide = 0.9915, r for 2,5-dichlorothiophene = 0.9947. V. Analysis of samples: Under stable instrument conditions, the sulfur content in the samples was determined, and the amount of sulfur-containing substances in the samples was quantified using the external standard method. Test results: Thiophene, carbon disulfide, and 2,5-dichlorothiophene were not detected in petroleum-grade chlorobenzene; thiophene and carbon disulfide were not detected in coking-grade chlorobenzene, while the content of 2,5-dichlorothiophene was relatively high

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.